Chiddarwar Vaishnavi Vivek, Wilford Katherine F, Hooper Troy L, James C Roger, Natesan Karthick, Likness Aaron, Seeber Gesine H, Sizer Phillip S
Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79415, USA.
Physical Therapy Program, Murphy Deming College of Health Sciences, Mary Baldwin University, Fishersville, VA 22939, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2025 May 25;13(6):160. doi: 10.3390/sports13060160.
Knee injury risk screening protocols predominantly employ high-impact tasks (HIT), but there is a need for low-impact movement screening alternatives. This study aimed to investigate kinematic carryover between low-impact tasks (LIT) and HIT.
This study employed a cross-sectional design. Eighteen healthy, active females with no history of injury within the last six months, aged between 18-35 years completed three trials of LIT (stand-to-sit, single-leg stand-to-sit) and HIT (drop vertical jump, single-leg drop vertical jump). Hip and knee three-dimensional kinematics were evaluated during LIT and HIT. Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess kinematic relationships between LIT and HIT. A post-hoc exploratory analysis examined the consistency of kinematic directionality across tasks.
In the frontal plane, the dominant hip, dominant knee, and non-dominant knee during LIT demonstrated a strong positive correlation and directional consistency with the corresponding values during HITs ( < 0.001). In the transverse plane, non-dominant hip, dominant knee, and non-dominant knee kinematics during LITs demonstrated directional consistency and a strong positive correlation with respective kinematics during HITs ( < 0.001).
The similarities in hip and knee kinematic patterns suggest that motor responses may generalize across varying task intensities. Thus, LITs may be a useful tool in early knee injury risk identification.
膝关节损伤风险筛查方案主要采用高冲击任务(HIT),但需要低冲击运动筛查的替代方案。本研究旨在调查低冲击任务(LIT)和高冲击任务之间的运动学迁移情况。
本研究采用横断面设计。18名年龄在18至35岁之间、过去六个月内无损伤史的健康活跃女性完成了三项低冲击任务(从站立到坐下、单腿从站立到坐下)和高冲击任务(垂直跳、单腿垂直跳)的试验。在低冲击任务和高冲击任务期间评估髋部和膝部的三维运动学。使用Pearson相关分析评估低冲击任务和高冲击任务之间的运动学关系。事后探索性分析检查了各任务间运动学方向性的一致性。
在额状面,低冲击任务期间的优势髋、优势膝和非优势膝与高冲击任务期间的对应值呈现出强正相关和方向一致性(<0.001)。在横断面,低冲击任务期间非优势髋、优势膝和非优势膝运动学与高冲击任务期间各自的运动学呈现出方向一致性和强正相关(<0.001)。
髋部和膝部运动学模式的相似性表明,运动反应可能在不同任务强度间具有普遍性。因此,低冲击任务可能是早期膝关节损伤风险识别中的一种有用工具。