揭示孟德尔随机化研究中潜在的报告偏倚 - Suppr | 超能文献

相似文献

1

Unraveling potential reporting bias in Mendelian randomization studies.揭示孟德尔随机化研究中潜在的报告偏倚

Hum Genet. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02759-5.

2

Associations between potential causal factors and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.潜在因果因素与结直肠癌风险之间的关联：孟德尔随机化研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

J Dig Dis. 2022 Aug;23(8-9):435-445. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13130. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

3

An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化中赢家诅咒对估计值影响的实证研究

Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1209-1219. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac233.

4

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.使用无效工具变量的孟德尔随机化：通过Egger回归进行效应估计和偏差检测

Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

5

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement.加强采用孟德尔随机化的观察性研究报告：STROBE-MR 声明。

JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1614-1621. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236.

6

Summarizing attributable factors and evaluating risk of bias of Mendelian randomization studies for Alzheimer's dementia and cognitive status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.总结阿尔茨海默病痴呆症和认知状态的孟德尔随机化研究的归因因素并评估偏倚风险：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 13;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02792-5.

7

Unbiased causal inference with Mendelian randomization and covariate-adjusted GWAS data.利用孟德尔随机化和协变量调整的全基因组关联研究数据进行无偏因果推断。

HGG Adv. 2025 Apr 10;6(2):100412. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100412. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

8

An integrated approach to the meta-analysis of genetic association studies using Mendelian randomization.一种使用孟德尔随机化对基因关联研究进行荟萃分析的综合方法。

Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Sep 1;160(5):445-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh228.

9

Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies.避免孟德尔随机化研究中弱工具的偏倚。

Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):755-64. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr036. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

10

Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be?在孟德尔随机化中对选择偏差进行情境化分析：它可能有多糟糕？

Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):691-701. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy202.

本文引用的文献

1

Mendelian randomization analysis and molecular mechanism study of childhood asthma and obstructive sleep apnea.儿童哮喘与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的孟德尔随机化分析及分子机制研究

Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;144(4):443-461. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02734-0. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

2

Multidimensional phenotyping to distinguish among central (CSA), obstructive (OSA) and co-existing central and obstructive sleep apnea (CSA-OSA) phenotypes in real-world data.在实际数据中进行多维度表型分析，以区分中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停（CSA）、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停（OSA）以及并存的中枢性与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停（CSA-OSA）表型。

Sleep Med. 2024 Dec;124:426-433. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.040. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

3