Shao Feifei, Wang Nianxin
School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326774. eCollection 2025.
Platform firms in the digital economy face a critical challenge: balancing differentiation-driven competitive strategies with the need for institutional legitimacy. While existing research recognizes this tension, current frameworks inadequately address how governance mechanisms mediate strategic positioning in trust-sensitive sharing economy contexts. This study integrates Porterian positioning theory with platform boundary theory to analyze 33 chinese sharing platforms through fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), examining configurations of three external positioning dimensions (variety-based, gender-based, and region-based differentiation) and two internal governance dimensions (resource ownership and transaction process differentiation). Our analysis identifies two equifinal success pathways: (1) An aggressive strategy combining market pioneering in user segmentation with cautious transaction governance, and (2) a conservative strategy aligning geographic specialization with institutional compliance in resource ownership. Both pathways demonstrate that governance mechanisms compensate for the legitimacy risks inherent in differentiation strategies, with platform performance contingent on strategic coherence between external positioning and internal governance architectures. Three key theoretical advances emerge: First, integrating Porterian positioning theory with platform boundary theory, we demonstrate how governance dimensions serve as compensatory tools that enable radical market differentiation in sharing economy platforms without legitimacy erosion, a trade-off insufficiently addressed in prior distinctiveness theory research. Second, building on configuration theory, in the context of the sharing economy, we solve the theoretical tensions in the distinctiveness-performance relationship by demonstrating configurational equifinality-both radical and conservative strategies succeed when external and internal dimensions achieve strategic coherence. Third, advancing research of sharing user participation, we establish that participation in trust-sensitive sharing platforms depends on strategic alignment between positioning and governance dimensions rather than isolated optimization of individual dimensions. These contextualized findings provide managers with evidence-based frameworks to coordinate market positioning strategies with governance investments, particularly when operating in institutionally complex environments. The demonstrated mechanisms in China's sharing economy warrant future verification in other platform types and cultural contexts.
在差异化驱动的竞争战略与制度合法性需求之间取得平衡。虽然现有研究认识到了这种紧张关系,但当前的框架未能充分解决治理机制如何在信任敏感的共享经济背景下调节战略定位的问题。本研究将波特定位理论与平台边界理论相结合,通过模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)对33个中国共享平台进行分析,考察三个外部定位维度(基于品类、基于性别和基于区域的差异化)和两个内部治理维度(资源所有权和交易流程差异化)的配置情况。我们的分析确定了两条等效的成功路径:(1)一种激进战略,将用户细分中的市场开拓与谨慎的交易治理相结合;(2)一种保守战略,使地理专业化与资源所有权方面的制度合规保持一致。两条路径都表明,治理机制能够弥补差异化战略中固有的合法性风险,平台绩效取决于外部定位与内部治理架构之间的战略一致性。由此产生了三项关键的理论进展:第一,将波特定位理论与平台边界理论相结合,我们证明了治理维度如何作为补偿工具,使共享经济平台在不侵蚀合法性的情况下实现激进的市场差异化,这是先前独特性理论研究中未充分探讨的权衡。第二,基于组态理论,在共享经济背景下,我们通过证明组态等效性解决了独特性与绩效关系中的理论紧张问题——当外部和内部维度实现战略一致性时,激进和保守战略都会成功。第三,推进对共享用户参与的研究,我们确定,参与信任敏感的共享平台取决于定位与治理维度之间的战略一致性,而非单个维度的孤立优化。这些情境化的研究结果为管理者提供了基于证据的框架,以便将市场定位战略与治理投资相协调,尤其是在制度复杂的环境中运营时。中国共享经济中展示的机制有待未来在其他平台类型和文化背景下进行验证。