Smith-Merry Jennifer, Mellifont Damian, Scanlan Justin Newton, Hancock Nicola
Professor and ARC Industry Laureate Fellow, Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lived Experience Postdoctoral Fellow, Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0312450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312450. eCollection 2025.
Unkind bureaucratic policies such as the Australian Robodebt policy, which targeted welfare recipients with automatic debt letters, and are geared towards economic savings, can significantly harm those impacted by them. Compassion and kindness are receiving increased research attention related to how organisations work internally. However, a greater investment in studies is needed to increase understandings about how compassion and kindness can underpin interactions with external stakeholders. Addressing this research gap, we aimed to identify barriers, enablers and outcomes to organisational kindness and compassion informed by the literature, and to propose future research directions related to organisational kindness and compassion towards external stakeholders. A search of four scholarly databases identified 25 relevant publications. Thematic analysis of included publications revealed barriers of commodification, personal risks, dysfunctional environments, inauthentic attempts at, and a lack of understanding of the need to be compassionate or kind. Enablers included building compassion into organisational policies, processes, practices and activities, compassion contagion, training of staff, leading with compassion, and kind and compassionate communication. Outcomes of kindness included building positive and healthy relationships with stakeholders, supporting positive experiences among stakeholders, and contributing to an organisation's profitability, productivity, performance and standing in the community. We conclude by recognising that kindness is essential for ongoing trust in health and social care institutions and government policy.
一些不友善的官僚政策,比如澳大利亚的“机器人债务”政策,该政策向福利领取者自动发送债务信函,其目的是实现经济节约,却会严重伤害受其影响的人。同情心和友善在组织内部运作方式方面正受到越来越多的研究关注。然而,需要加大研究投入,以增进对同情心和友善如何支撑与外部利益相关者互动的理解。为填补这一研究空白,我们旨在依据文献确定组织友善和同情心的障碍、促成因素及结果,并提出与组织对外部利益相关者的友善和同情心相关的未来研究方向。对四个学术数据库的检索共找到25篇相关出版物。对纳入出版物的主题分析揭示了商品化、个人风险、功能失调的环境、虚假的尝试以及对同情心或友善必要性缺乏理解等障碍。促成因素包括将同情心融入组织政策、流程、实践和活动中,同情心的传播、员工培训、以同情心引领以及友善和富有同情心的沟通。友善的结果包括与利益相关者建立积极健康的关系、支持利益相关者的积极体验,以及为组织的盈利能力、生产力、绩效和在社区中的地位做出贡献。我们最后认识到,友善对于健康和社会护理机构以及政府政策的持续信任至关重要。