Suppr超能文献

密集点阵放射治疗的自动化临床剂量测定计划

Automated Clinical Dosimetry Planning of Dense Lattice Radiation Therapy.

作者信息

Macias-Verde David, Burgos-Burgos Javier, Lara Pedro C

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Juan de Quesada, 30, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Oncology Department, Centro Oncologico Integral Canario (COIC), Hospitales Universitarios San Roque (HUSR), Dolores dela Rocha 5, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;17(12):2048. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122048.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients bearing large-volume, bulky primary or relapsed tumors, are usually referred to palliative low-dose radiotherapy with very poor results. Lattice Radiation Therapy (LRT) is able to produce a high number of high-dose foci or vortexes (multiple SBRT treatments), separated by low-dose zones (valleys). Treatment planning on vortex placing, valley definition, and dose administered depends on individual decisions of the treating team. The aim of our study is to assess for the first time the possibility of a dense fractionated LRT within the target volume.

METHODS

A total of 22 treatments in 20 patients were performed in the frame of a prospective observational study of fractionated LRT ongoing in our institution. According to our aim of achieving dense LRT, no GTV contraction was considered to create the LRTV (GTV is equal to LRTV). The vortexes were segmented as 1 cm diameter at a 1.5 cm vortex-to-vortex distance. Dose prescription to the vortexes per fraction was 12 Gy.

RESULTS

The vortex/LRTV ratio was 7.38 ± 2.13% (3.4-10.40%, median 7.60%). Mean dose to the vortex volume was 11.90 ± 0.09 Gy (11.70-12.10 Gy, median 11.90 Gy). Mean dose administered to the valley volume was 8.29 ± 0.70 (7.05-9.51 Gy, median 8.29 Gy). Valley/vortex (peak) dose ratio (VPDR) was 69.40 ± 6.02% (59.00-79.80%, median 69.70%). The mean peripheral tumor dose was 5.11 ± 0.8710 Gy (3.16-6.78 Gy, median 5.18 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

Our dense LRT schedule fulfilled most of the recommended guidelines for LRT, increasing the high dose points without risking the dose to the surrounding tissues. Further analysis of feasibility and safety are needed to secure the clinical relevance of our proposed protocol.

摘要

背景

患有大体积、 bulky 原发性或复发性肿瘤的患者通常接受姑息性低剂量放疗,效果很差。点阵放射治疗(LRT)能够产生大量高剂量灶或涡旋(多次立体定向体部放疗治疗),其间由低剂量区(谷)分隔。涡旋放置、谷的定义和所给予剂量的治疗计划取决于治疗团队的个人决策。我们研究的目的是首次评估在靶区内进行密集分割LRT的可能性。

方法

在我们机构正在进行的一项关于分割LRT的前瞻性观察研究框架内,对20例患者共进行了22次治疗。根据我们实现密集LRT的目标,在创建LRTV时未考虑GTV收缩(GTV等于LRTV)。将涡旋分割为直径1cm,涡旋间距离为1.5cm。每次分割对涡旋的剂量处方为12Gy。

结果

涡旋/LRTV比值为7.38±2.13%(3.4 - 10.40%,中位数7.60%)。涡旋体积的平均剂量为11.90±0.09Gy(11.70 - 12.10Gy,中位数11.90Gy)。给予谷体积的平均剂量为8.29±0.70(7.05 - 9.51Gy,中位数8.29Gy)。谷/涡旋(峰值)剂量比(VPDR)为69.40±6.02%(59.00 - 79.80%,中位数69.70%)。平均外周肿瘤剂量为5.11±0.8710Gy(3.16 - 6.78Gy,中位数5.18Gy)。

结论

我们的密集LRT方案符合LRT的大多数推荐指南,增加了高剂量点,而不会对周围组织造成剂量风险。需要进一步分析可行性和安全性,以确保我们提出的方案具有临床相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0de/12190776/a716da09dcc1/cancers-17-02048-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验