Zhang Yaya, Li Gongao, Hu Xuezhu, Zhang Peng, Ding Jinhong
Learning and Cognition Key Laboratory of Beijing, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China.
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):633. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060633.
Target enhancement and non-target suppression are two critical mechanisms underlying representational prioritization in visual working memory (VWM). However, it remains unclear how VWM load modulates these prioritization mechanisms. Using EEG combined with a retro-cue paradigm, this study investigated how representational prioritization emerges under low (Experiment 1) and high (Experiment 2) memory load conditions. Behavioral results showed that under low load, both target and non-target items benefited from retro-cue. ERP analyses revealed significantly larger P2 and P3b amplitudes in response to valid compared to neutral retro-cues, whereas no significant contralateral delay activity (CDA) component was observed. Under high load, cueing benefits were restricted to target items, whereas non-target items suffered impaired performance. ERP analyses again showed enhanced P2 and P3b amplitudes for valid compared to neutral retro-cues, but a significant CDA component was also observed. Time-frequency analyses further revealed frontal theta synchronization (ERS) and posterior alpha desynchronization (ERD) under both load conditions. Notably, theta-alpha phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) was significantly stronger for valid than neutral retro-cues under low load, whereas under high load, PAC did not significantly differ between cue conditions. Together, these findings suggest that target enhancement serves as a stable mechanism for representational prioritization, whereas non-target suppression critically depends on resource availability. VWM load systematically shapes representational prioritization through modulation of oscillatory timing characteristics and inter-regional neural coordination.
目标增强和非目标抑制是视觉工作记忆(VWM)中表征优先级的两个关键机制。然而,VWM负荷如何调节这些优先级机制仍不清楚。本研究采用脑电图结合逆向线索范式,探究了在低(实验1)和高(实验2)记忆负荷条件下表征优先级是如何出现的。行为结果表明,在低负荷下,目标和非目标项目都从逆向线索中受益。ERP分析显示,与中性逆向线索相比,有效逆向线索诱发的P2和P3b波幅显著更大,而未观察到明显的对侧延迟活动(CDA)成分。在高负荷下,线索提示的益处仅限于目标项目,而非目标项目的表现受损。ERP分析再次显示,与中性逆向线索相比,有效逆向线索诱发的P2和P3b波幅增强,但也观察到明显的CDA成分。时频分析进一步揭示了在两种负荷条件下额叶θ同步化(ERS)和后顶叶α去同步化(ERD)。值得注意的是,在低负荷下,有效逆向线索的θ- α相位-振幅耦合(PAC)显著强于中性逆向线索,而在高负荷下,线索条件之间的PAC没有显著差异。总之,这些发现表明,目标增强是表征优先级的一种稳定机制,而非目标抑制关键取决于资源可用性。VWM负荷通过调节振荡时间特征和区域间神经协调,系统地塑造了表征优先级。