Pavel Roxana Maria Sanziana, Radu Andrei-Flavius, Radu Ada, Uivaraseanu Bogdan, Bungau Gabriela, Tit Delia Mirela, Nistor Cseppento Delia Carmen, Negru Paul Andrei
Doctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Department of Psycho-Neurosciences and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 31;12(6):602. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060602.
Osteoarthritis is a disabling condition with highly complex overall management and persistent shortcomings, contributing significantly to the global disease burden. Although research in the field has grown considerably in recent years alongside technological advancements, a cohesive and structured understanding of the evolution of the scientific literature, particularly regarding clinical management and outcome evaluation, remains insufficiently developed. To date, most bibliometric analyses in osteoarthritis have focused narrowly on specific subdomains, leaving a notable gap in comprehensive assessments of the broader clinical framework. This study addresses that gap through an integrated, structured, and visual approach using multiple bibliometric techniques targeting osteoarthritis diagnosis and management, aiming to guide future research and improve strategic development. Scientific publication in osteoarthritis has expanded exponentially, peaking in 2024 with 1234 documents. The United States led in both output and citation impact, while China showed rapid growth. emerged as the most influential journal. Australian institutions, especially the University of Sydney, demonstrated a remarkable ascent. Five global research clusters were identified, with the U.S. as the central node and Australia serving as a bridge between Western and Asian collaborations. Research themes evolved toward integrated models connecting biological mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and patient-centered outcomes. This bibliometric assessment underscores exponential growth in osteoarthritis research and highlights the urgent need for more personalized, multidimensional evaluation strategies to enhance clinical translation.
骨关节炎是一种致残性疾病,其整体管理高度复杂且存在持续的不足,对全球疾病负担有重大影响。尽管近年来随着技术进步,该领域的研究有了显著增长,但对科学文献演变的连贯且结构化的理解,尤其是关于临床管理和结果评估方面,仍发展不足。迄今为止,大多数骨关节炎的文献计量分析都局限于特定子领域,在对更广泛临床框架的全面评估方面存在明显差距。本研究通过使用针对骨关节炎诊断和管理的多种文献计量技术,采用综合、结构化和可视化的方法来填补这一差距,旨在指导未来研究并改善战略发展。骨关节炎领域的科学出版物呈指数级增长,在2024年达到峰值,有1234篇文献。美国在产出和引文影响力方面均领先,而中国则显示出快速增长。《 》成为最具影响力的期刊。澳大利亚的机构,尤其是悉尼大学,表现出显著的上升趋势。确定了五个全球研究集群,美国是中心节点,澳大利亚是西方与亚洲合作之间的桥梁。研究主题朝着连接生物学机制、治疗策略和以患者为中心的结果的综合模型发展。这项文献计量评估强调了骨关节炎研究的指数级增长,并突出了迫切需要更个性化、多维度的评估策略以加强临床转化。 (注:原文中“ emerged as the most influential journal.”处有缺失信息)