Kang Tinghu, Wang Ping
School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(6):790. doi: 10.3390/bs15060790.
The artistic expression inherent in Chinese paintings serves as a conduit for the artists' emotional and cognitive expression. However, current research lacks consensus regarding the distinct psychological mechanisms underlying the appreciation of Chinese painting genres (landscape vs. figure paintings). This study-employing a vocabulary generation task and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to compare semantic representation and emotional awareness during participants' viewing these two types of paintings-aims to elucidate potential disparities in aesthetic processing. In Experiment 1, although both types of paintings produced an abundance of content words, figure paintings elicited a greater number of emotional association words than landscape paintings. Meanwhile, Experiment 2 demonstrated faster response times for an incompatible joint task versus a compatible joint task. These findings collectively suggest that the aesthetic of paintings may engage automatic processes, with the effects on semantic representation and emotional awareness appearing to be independent of the type of paintings. The predominance of content processing over emotional response may be attributed to the temporal characteristics of emotional arousal.
中国画中固有的艺术表达是艺术家情感和认知表达的一种渠道。然而,目前的研究对于欣赏中国画流派(山水画与人物画)背后不同的心理机制缺乏共识。本研究采用词汇生成任务和内隐联想测验(IAT),比较参与者观看这两种类型的画作时的语义表征和情感意识,旨在阐明审美加工中的潜在差异。在实验1中,尽管两种类型的画作都产生了大量的内容词,但人物画比山水画引发了更多的情感联想词。同时,实验2表明,不相容联合任务的反应时间比相容联合任务更快。这些发现共同表明,绘画审美可能涉及自动加工过程,对语义表征和情感意识的影响似乎与画作类型无关。内容加工相对于情感反应的优势可能归因于情感唤起的时间特征。