• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)参数和信号衰减分析表征乳腺肿瘤异质性

Characterizing Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through IVIM-DWI Parameters and Signal Decay Analysis.

作者信息

Chan Si-Wa, Lin Chun-An, Ouyang Yen-Chieh, Chen Guan-Yuan, Chang Chein-I, Lin Chin-Yao, Hung Chih-Chiang, Lum Chih-Yean, Wang Kuo-Chung, Liu Ming-Cheng

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 40601, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;15(12):1499. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121499.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15121499
PMID:40564820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12191917/
Abstract

This research presents a novel analytical method for breast tumor characterization and tissue classification by leveraging intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) combined with hyperspectral imaging techniques and deep learning. Traditionally, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is employed for breast tumor diagnosis, but it involves gadolinium-based contrast agents, which carry potential health risks. IVIM imaging extends conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by explicitly separating the signal decay into components representing true molecular diffusion (D) and microcirculation of capillary blood (pseudo-diffusion or D*). This separation allows for a more comprehensive, non-invasive assessment of tissue characteristics without the need for contrast agents, thereby offering a safer alternative for breast cancer diagnosis. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods for breast tumor characterization using IVIM-DWI data treated as hyperspectral image stacks. Dice similarity coefficients and Jaccard indices were specifically used to evaluate the spatial segmentation accuracy of tumor boundaries, confirmed by experienced physicians on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), emphasizing detailed tumor characterization rather than binary diagnosis of cancer. The data source for this study consisted of breast MRI scans obtained from 22 patients diagnosed with mass-type breast cancer, resulting in 22 distinct mass tumor cases analyzed. MR images were acquired using a 3T MRI system (Discovery MR750 3.0 Tesla, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with axial IVIM sequences and a bipolar pulsed gradient spin echo sequence. Multiple b-values ranging from 0 to 2500 s/mm were utilized, specifically thirteen original b-values (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 100, 200, 400, 600, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm), with the last four b-value images replicated once for a total of 17 bands used in the analysis. The methodology involved several steps: acquisition of multi-b-value IVIM-DWI images, image pre-processing, including correction for motion and intensity inhomogeneity, treating the multi-b-value data as hyperspectral image stacks, applying hyperspectral techniques like band expansion, and evaluating three tumor detection methods: kernel-based constrained energy minimization (KCEM), iterative KCEM (I-KCEM), and deep neural networks (DNNs). The comparisons were assessed by evaluating the similarity of the detection results from each method to ground truth tumor areas, which were manually drawn on DCE-MRI images and confirmed by experienced physicians. Similarity was quantitatively measured using the Dice similarity coefficient and the Jaccard index. Additionally, the performance of the detectors was evaluated using 3D-ROC analysis and its derived criteria (, , , , , ). The findings objectively demonstrated that the DNN method achieved superior performance in breast tumor detection compared to KCEM and I-KCEM. Specifically, the DNN yielded a Dice similarity coefficient of 86.56% and a Jaccard index of 76.30%, whereas KCEM achieved 78.49% (Dice) and 64.60% (Jaccard), and I-KCEM achieved 78.55% (Dice) and 61.37% (Jaccard). Evaluation using 3D-ROC analysis also indicated that the DNN was the best detector based on metrics like target detection rate and overall effectiveness. The DNN model further exhibited the capability to identify tumor heterogeneity, differentiating high- and low-cellularity regions. Quantitative parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (PF), were calculated and analyzed, providing insights into the diffusion characteristics of different breast tissues. Analysis of signal intensity decay curves generated from these parameters further illustrated distinct diffusion patterns and confirmed that high cellularity tumor regions showed greater water molecule confinement compared to low cellularity regions. This study highlights the potential of combining IVIM-DWI, hyperspectral imaging techniques, and deep learning as a robust, safe, and effective non-invasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer, offering a valuable alternative to contrast-enhanced methods by providing detailed information about tissue microstructure and heterogeneity without the need for contrast agents.

摘要

本研究提出了一种新颖的分析方法,通过利用体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)结合高光谱成像技术和深度学习,对乳腺肿瘤进行特征描述和组织分类。传统上,动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)用于乳腺肿瘤诊断,但它涉及基于钆的造影剂,存在潜在健康风险。IVIM成像通过将信号衰减明确分离为代表真实分子扩散(D)和毛细血管血液微循环(伪扩散或D*)的成分,扩展了传统扩散加权成像(DWI)。这种分离允许在无需造影剂的情况下对组织特征进行更全面、非侵入性的评估,从而为乳腺癌诊断提供了更安全的替代方法。本研究的主要目的是评估使用作为高光谱图像堆栈处理的IVIM-DWI数据进行乳腺肿瘤特征描述的不同方法。Dice相似系数和Jaccard指数专门用于评估肿瘤边界的空间分割准确性,由经验丰富的医生在动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)上确认,强调详细的肿瘤特征描述而非癌症的二元诊断。本研究的数据来源包括从22例被诊断为肿块型乳腺癌的患者获得的乳腺MRI扫描,共分析了22个不同的肿块肿瘤病例。使用3T MRI系统(Discovery MR750 3.0特斯拉,GE医疗保健公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥,美国)通过轴向IVIM序列和双极脉冲梯度自旋回波序列采集MR图像。使用了范围从0到2500 s/mm的多个b值,具体为13个原始b值(0、15、30、45、60、100、200、400、600、1000、1500、2000和2500 s/mm),最后四个b值图像复制一次,分析中共使用17个波段。该方法包括几个步骤:采集多b值IVIM-DWI图像、图像预处理,包括运动和强度不均匀性校正、将多b值数据作为高光谱图像堆栈处理、应用如波段扩展等高光谱技术,以及评估三种肿瘤检测方法:基于核的约束能量最小化(KCEM)、迭代KCEM(I-KCEM)和深度神经网络(DNN)。通过评估每种方法的检测结果与在DCE-MRI图像上手动绘制并由经验丰富的医生确认的真实肿瘤区域的相似性来进行比较。使用Dice相似系数和Jaccard指数进行相似性的定量测量。此外,使用3D-ROC分析及其导出标准(......)评估探测器的性能。研究结果客观地表明,与KCEM和I-KCEM相比,DNN方法在乳腺肿瘤检测中表现出卓越的性能。具体而言,DNN的Dice相似系数为86.56%,Jaccard指数为76.30%,而KCEM分别为78.49%(Dice)和64.60%(Jaccard),I-KCEM分别为78.55%(Dice)和61.37%(Jaccard)。使用3D-ROC分析进行的评估还表明,基于目标检测率和整体有效性等指标,DNN是最佳探测器。DNN模型还表现出识别肿瘤异质性的能力,区分高细胞密度和低细胞密度区域。计算并分析了包括表观扩散系数(ADC)、纯扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(PF)在内的定量参数,提供了对不同乳腺组织扩散特征的见解。对由这些参数生成的信号强度衰减曲线的分析进一步说明了不同的扩散模式,并证实高细胞密度肿瘤区域与低细胞密度区域相比显示出更大的水分子限制。本研究强调了将IVIM-DWI、高光谱成像技术和深度学习相结合作为一种强大、安全且有效的乳腺癌非侵入性诊断工具的潜力,通过在无需造影剂的情况下提供有关组织微观结构和异质性的详细信息,为对比增强方法提供了有价值的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/cf92512852f3/diagnostics-15-01499-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/24bd3da35c71/diagnostics-15-01499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/3caec416fd27/diagnostics-15-01499-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/a52c3271e0b5/diagnostics-15-01499-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/68581a8c0060/diagnostics-15-01499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/05db85e06ceb/diagnostics-15-01499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/1380c8aa6a35/diagnostics-15-01499-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/0808f37e4783/diagnostics-15-01499-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/e4bb0441e28d/diagnostics-15-01499-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/26c5ad46f91d/diagnostics-15-01499-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/ce2bd9ca20ba/diagnostics-15-01499-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/30db339251fd/diagnostics-15-01499-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/cf92512852f3/diagnostics-15-01499-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/24bd3da35c71/diagnostics-15-01499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/3caec416fd27/diagnostics-15-01499-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/a52c3271e0b5/diagnostics-15-01499-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/68581a8c0060/diagnostics-15-01499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/05db85e06ceb/diagnostics-15-01499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/1380c8aa6a35/diagnostics-15-01499-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/0808f37e4783/diagnostics-15-01499-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/e4bb0441e28d/diagnostics-15-01499-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/26c5ad46f91d/diagnostics-15-01499-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/ce2bd9ca20ba/diagnostics-15-01499-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/30db339251fd/diagnostics-15-01499-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7fa/12191917/cf92512852f3/diagnostics-15-01499-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterizing Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through IVIM-DWI Parameters and Signal Decay Analysis.通过体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)参数和信号衰减分析表征乳腺肿瘤异质性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;15(12):1499. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121499.
2
Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定量扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性胰腺病变的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7746-7759. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07880-3. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Quantifying multi-institutional ADC measurement variability of 1.5 T MR-Linacs: A phantom and in vivo study.量化1.5T磁共振直线加速器的多机构ADC测量变异性:一项模体和体内研究。
Med Phys. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1002/mp.17739.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS or TNM Staging.动态对比增强磁共振成像在评估前列腺腺癌中的作用:一项对前列腺切除患者队列进行的部分盲法回顾性研究,该研究将全腺体组织病理学相关性与PI-RADS或TNM分期的应用相结合。
Prostate. 2025 Apr;85(5):413-423. doi: 10.1002/pros.24843. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
8
Simultaneous non-contrast assessment of cardiac microstructure and perfusion in vivo in the human heart.在人体心脏中对心脏微观结构和灌注进行同步非对比体内评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101129. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101129. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
9
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和磁共振成像(MRI)在早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移评估中的应用:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta15040.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Gynecological Oncology from Diagnosis to Surgery.从诊断到手术的妇科肿瘤学中的人工智能
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;17(7):1060. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071060.
2
Predicting Pathogenic Variants of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound-Derived Machine Learning Models.使用超声衍生的机器学习模型预测乳腺癌的致病变异
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;17(6):1019. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061019.
3
Deep Learning Models Based on Pretreatment MRI and Clinicopathological Data to Predict Responses to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
基于治疗前磁共振成像和临床病理数据的深度学习模型预测三阴性乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗的反应
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;17(6):966. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060966.
4
Radiological Insights into Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Implications for Cancer Patient Management.乳房切除术后乳房重建中脱细胞真皮基质整合的影像学见解:对癌症患者管理的启示。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 10;17(6):933. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060933.
5
Predictors of Recurrence and Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery: A Comprehensive Statistical Analysis.接受新辅助化疗和手术的乳腺癌患者复发及总生存的预测因素:一项全面的统计分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;17(6):924. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060924.
6
Retrospectively Quantified T2 Improves Detection of Clinically Significant Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.回顾性定量T2加权成像可提高临床显著外周带前列腺癌的检出率。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):381. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030381.
7
Advances for Managing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Integrating Imaging and AI Innovations.胰腺囊性病变管理的进展:整合影像学与人工智能创新
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 22;16(24):4268. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244268.
8
A study of the correlations between IVIM-DWI parameters and the histologic differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma.一项研究探讨了 IVIM-DWI 参数与肝细胞癌组织学分化之间的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89784-2.
9
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.2020年癌症统计数据概述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
10
The role of histogram analysis in diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.直方图分析在扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01257-0.