• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病学决策的三元视角:拉脱维亚服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究

Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia.

作者信息

Olsena Solvita, Stars Inese, Rozenberga Elza Eliza, Konstantinova Karina, Baidina Ksenija

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1416. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121416.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13121416
PMID:40565443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12192966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Decision making is fundamental to personal autonomy and person-centered, rights-based psychiatric care. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of decision making in psychiatric care from the perspectives of service users, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, identifying contexts that facilitate or hinder these practices.

METHODS

An exploratory-descriptive qualitative design was applied, using semi-structured interviews with eight service users, six caregivers, and seven healthcare professionals (21 interviews in total). Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Four main categories were identified: (1) antecedents for decision making, (2) challenges in decision making, (3) consequences of decision making, and (4) recommendations for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into how decisions in psychiatric care are made in Latvia, highlighting the legal, personal, and institutional factors influencing these processes. Participants offered valuable perspectives, identifying both facilitators and barriers to autonomous decision making, as well as suggesting necessary improvements. The findings suggest the need for legal reform and systemic improvements in practices that favor agency in decision making. Additionally, they underscore the importance of strengthening individual capacities to support meaningful collaboration among service users, caregivers, and healthcare professionals in making healthcare decisions that enhance the quality of care and well-being of people with mental health difficulties.

摘要

背景/目标:决策对于个人自主权以及以个人为中心、基于权利的精神科护理至关重要。本研究从服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的角度探讨了精神科护理中决策的认知和体验,确定了促进或阻碍这些做法的背景情况。

方法

采用探索性描述性定性设计,对8名服务使用者、6名护理人员和7名医疗保健专业人员进行半结构化访谈(共21次访谈)。数据逐字转录,并通过归纳性内容分析进行分析。

结果

确定了四个主要类别:(1)决策的前提条件,(2)决策中的挑战,(3)决策的后果,以及(4)改进建议。

结论

本研究深入了解了拉脱维亚精神科护理中决策是如何做出的,突出了影响这些过程的法律、个人和机构因素。参与者提供了宝贵的观点,确定了自主决策的促进因素和障碍,并提出了必要的改进建议。研究结果表明需要进行法律改革并在有利于决策自主性的实践中进行系统性改进。此外,这些结果强调了加强个人能力以支持服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员之间有意义的合作,从而做出能够提高心理健康问题患者护理质量和福祉的医疗决策的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/12192966/490bf266778b/healthcare-13-01416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/12192966/490bf266778b/healthcare-13-01416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8047/12192966/490bf266778b/healthcare-13-01416-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia.精神病学决策的三元视角:拉脱维亚服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1416. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121416.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to Person-centred Care in Child and Young People Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.促进和阻碍儿童和青少年心理健康服务中以患者为中心的护理的因素:系统评价。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):870-886. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2052. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Triadic shared decision making in emergency psychiatry: an explorative study.急诊精神病学中的三元共同决策:一项探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06640-7.
2
Examining Physicians' Approaches to Treating Relatives in Primary Health Care Centers: Insights from a Qualitative Study.审视基层医疗中心医生治疗亲属的方法:一项定性研究的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;12(20):2021. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202021.
3
Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.
患者参与精神卫生保健-医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点:范围综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;45(8):794-810. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
5
Person-Centred Decision-Making in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.心理健康中的以患者为中心的决策:范围综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Mar;45(3):294-310. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2023.2288181. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members.体验(共享)决策:对患有精神疾病的患者及其家庭成员的定性研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(16):2237. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162237.
7
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
The experiences of psychiatric patients, their caregivers and companions in upholding patient dignity during hospitalization: A qualitative study.精神病患者及其照料者和陪伴者在住院期间维护患者尊严的体验:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1915-1922. doi: 10.1111/hex.13799. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
9
Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study.参与临床决策和满意度对精神卫生实践结果的影响:CEDAR 欧洲纵向研究的结果。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;34(7-8):848-860. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program.在神经医学中心通过“共享关爱”计划全面实施共同决策
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 13;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388432. eCollection 2023.