Strasser Samantha, McDonald Isabella R, Uveges Melissa K, Hesse-Biber Sharlene, Keels Jordan, Smith Neil, Dwyer Andrew A
Global Public Health and the Common Good, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 22;16(6):614. doi: 10.3390/genes16060614.
: Rare diseases are predominantly genetic in etiology and characterized by a prolonged 'diagnostic odyssey'. Advances in genetic testing (GT) have helped shorten the time to diagnosis for rare/undiagnosed conditions. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on psychosocial factors related to GT for rare diseases to inform more person-centered approaches to care. : We conducted a systematic literature search in six databases using structured terms (September 2024). Retrieved articles underwent independent dual review. Data were extracted and collated in tables for analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify promoters/barriers to GT for patients and families. Findings were validated by a patient advocate and were reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Synthesized findings were mapped to the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform intervention development. : Of 1730 retrieved articles, 32 were included for data extraction/synthesis. Studies employed qualitative (n = 19), quantitative (n = 10), and mixed-methods (n = 3) approaches. Nearly all (29/32, 91%) were non-interventional, reporting on decision-making cognitions/processes (19/32, 59%), attitudes/preferences (15/32, 47%), psychosocial impact (6/32, 19%), and knowledge/awareness (4/32, 8%) of pre-conception/prenatal/diagnostic GT and carrier screening. Promoters included understanding GT, ending the diagnostic odyssey, actionable outcomes, personal/family history, altruism, and reproductive decision-making. Barriers included logistical (e.g., distance, cost), psychological burden, perceived lack of benefit, and discrimination/social stigma concerns. : Some psychosocial factors related to GT for rare diseases overlap with those in literature on GT for common conditions. Identified factors represent targets for theory-informed, person-centered interventions to support high-quality GT decisions that are informed and aligned with patient/family values and preferences.
罕见病的病因主要为遗传性,其特点是诊断过程漫长。基因检测(GT)的进展有助于缩短罕见/未确诊疾病的诊断时间。我们旨在综合关于罕见病基因检测相关心理社会因素的证据,为更以患者为中心的护理方法提供参考。
我们于2024年9月在六个数据库中使用结构化术语进行了系统的文献检索。检索到的文章经过独立的双人评审。数据被提取并整理到表格中进行分析。采用主题分析法确定患者和家庭进行基因检测的促进因素/障碍因素。研究结果由患者权益倡导者进行验证,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。综合研究结果被映射到计划行为理论,以为干预措施的制定提供参考。
在检索到的1730篇文章中,有32篇被纳入数据提取/综合分析。研究采用了定性(n = 19)、定量(n = 10)和混合方法(n = 3)。几乎所有(29/32,91%)都是非干预性的,报告了孕前/产前/诊断性基因检测和携带者筛查的决策认知/过程(19/32,59%)、态度/偏好(15/32,47%)、心理社会影响(6/32,19%)以及知识/认知(4/32,8%)。促进因素包括对基因检测的理解、结束诊断过程、可采取行动的结果、个人/家族病史、利他主义以及生殖决策。障碍因素包括后勤方面(如距离、成本)、心理负担、认为缺乏益处以及对歧视/社会污名的担忧。
一些与罕见病基因检测相关的心理社会因素与常见疾病基因检测文献中的因素重叠。所确定的因素代表了基于理论、以患者为中心的干预措施的目标,以支持高质量的基因检测决策,这些决策应基于患者/家庭的价值观和偏好并与之相符。