The Safety and Feasibility of Single-Stage Versus Staged Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Appendicitis with Inguinal Hernia in Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Study.

The simultaneous surgical treatment of acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia in children is still controversial. However, there are no established guidelines for the simultaneous surgical treatment of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia in a pediatric population. The case records of 2254 pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2025 were reviewed. Finally, 44 patients who met the inclusion criteria and had an inguinal hernia at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy were selected for further analysis. The patients who underwent single-stage surgery (simultaneous laparoscopic appendectomy and hernia repair) were assigned to group I ( = 25), while the patients who underwent delayed laparoscopic hernia repair were assigned to group II ( = 19). The groups were compared for final outcome, complications, rate of readmissions within 30 days of index surgery, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. The mean age of all the included patients was 11.5 ± 4.0 years, with males slightly outnumbering females ( = 25, 56.8%). The study population consisted of two comparable groups in terms of age, anthropometric measures, gender distribution, and baseline clinical characteristics. A major difference between the two methods was the operation time, which was significantly longer in the single-stage group (53.5 ± 11.2 min vs. 41.5 ± 10.9 min; = 0.001). Despite the difference in operative time, the length of hospital stay (3.5 ± 2.0 days vs. 3.5 ± 2.2 days; = 0.899) was almost identical between the two groups, suggesting that the additional intraoperative time was not reflected in a prolonged recovery time. In addition, postoperative complications were rare and evenly distributed between both surgical strategies ( = 2 (8%) vs. = 2 (10.5%); = 0.772). All the complications were minor and were treated conservatively. Importantly, there was no recurrence of hernia in either group during the follow-up period. From a clinical perspective, these results suggest that the single-stage approach is feasible and safe, even in complicated appendicitis, particularly in cases where the postponement of hernia repair is not desirable. The longer operative time associated with the single-stage approach must be weighed against the potential benefits of avoiding a second surgical procedure and unnecessary anesthesia, reducing overall healthcare utilization, and minimizing patient burden.