Suppr超能文献

了解克罗恩病患者围手术期的疼痛感知:硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛对比

Understanding the Perioperative Perception of Pain in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Epidural Versus Non-Epidural Analgesia.

作者信息

Pistorius Regina, Widder Anna, Sabisch Marleen, Markus Christian, Meir Michael, Maatouk Imad, Germer Christoph-Thomas, Meybohm Patrick, Schlegel Nicolas, Kelm Matthias, Flemming Sven

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4383. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124383.

Abstract

Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) suffer from a relevant burden of abdominal pain and psychological distress that can aggravate postoperatively. While systematic strategies for postoperative pain management are lacking, the potential benefit of perioperative epidural analgesia (EDA) in CD patients is unclear. : All patients receiving an ileocecal resection due to CD at a tertiary hospital were included. The impact of epidural versus non-epidural analgesia on postoperative pain perception was evaluated by analyzing the numeric rating scale (NRS), analgesic consumption, and clinical outcomes. In this monocentric study, 172 patients receiving ileocecal resection due to CD were included, with 122 receiving EDA. The epidural pain catheters were kept for an average of 4.4 days (±1.3) before being removed. EDA resulted in significantly decreased pain as well as a decreased amount of analgesic consumption (adjuvant analgesics: 16.4% vs. 32%, = 0.021; strong opioids: 30.3% vs. 72.0%, < 0.001) at the early postoperative course (1 vs. 3 at rest and 2 vs. 4 movement-evoked, < 0.001). No difference in pain perception was detected on day 5 between EDA and non-EDA patients. Patients with EDA had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (7.5 versus 6 days, = 0.002) and an increased intake of weak opioids at discharge ( = 0.024). While EDA in CD patients resulted in significantly decreased pain and decreased amounts of analgesic adjuvants and strong opioids at the early postoperative course, intravenous and oral analgesia provide sufficient postoperative pain control after surgery and earlier patient autonomy.

摘要

克罗恩病(CD)患者承受着腹痛和心理困扰的相关负担,术后这些负担可能会加重。虽然缺乏术后疼痛管理的系统策略,但围手术期硬膜外镇痛(EDA)对CD患者的潜在益处尚不清楚。纳入一家三级医院所有因CD接受回盲部切除术的患者。通过分析数字评分量表(NRS)、镇痛药消耗量和临床结局,评估硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛对术后疼痛感知的影响。在这项单中心研究中,纳入了172例因CD接受回盲部切除术的患者,其中122例接受了EDA。硬膜外镇痛导管在拔除前平均保留4.4天(±1.3天)。在术后早期,EDA导致疼痛显著减轻,镇痛药消耗量也减少(辅助镇痛药:16.4%对32%,P = 0.021;强效阿片类药物:30.3%对72.0%,P < 0.001)(静息时1对3,活动诱发时2对4,P < 0.001)。在术后第5天,EDA组和非EDA组患者的疼痛感知无差异。接受EDA的患者住院时间显著更长(7.5天对6天,P = 0.002),出院时弱阿片类药物摄入量增加(P = 0.024)。虽然CD患者的EDA在术后早期导致疼痛显著减轻,辅助镇痛药和强效阿片类药物的用量减少,但静脉和口服镇痛在术后提供了足够的疼痛控制,并使患者更早获得自主。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c917/12193785/9c17efaed7d0/jcm-14-04383-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验