Fuentes-Barría Héctor, Aguilera-Eguía Raúl, Maureira-Sánchez Juan, Alarcón-Rivera Miguel, Garrido-Osorio Victor, López-Soto Olga Patrica, Aristizábal-Hoyos Juan Alberto, Angarita-Davila Lissé, Rojas-Gómez Diana, Bermudez Valmore, Flores-Fernández Cherie, Roco-Videla Ángel, González-Casanova Jorge Enrique, Urbano-Cerda Sebastian, Iulian Alexe Dan
Vicerrectoría de Investigación e Innovación, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1110939, Chile.
Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 3349001, Chile.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 May 28;10(2):195. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020195.
Interval block resistance training (IBRT) and circuit resistance training (CRT) are periodization models aimed at enhancing neuromuscular and metabolic adaptations. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a 12-week IBRT program compared to CRT on body composition, muscle strength, speed, functional capacity, and autonomic recovery in young Chilean adults. A randomized, parallel, double-blind study was conducted with 30 participants assigned to IBRT (n = 15) or CRT (n = 15). Assessments included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, right-hand grip strength, the running anaerobic sprint test (RAST), the 6 min walk test (6 MWT), and heart rate variability (HRV) indices: low-frequency to high-frequency ratio (LF/HF) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD, a time-domain HRV metric reflecting parasympathetic activity). Statistical analyses included -tests and ANCOVA. Groups were similar in age (IBRT: 25.2 ± 3.19; CRT: 23.27 ± 3.69, = 0.14) and BMI (IBRT: 21.56 ± 2.22; CRT: 22.36 ± 1.70 kg/m, = 0.40). Both groups improved significantly in waist circumference (IBRT: -1.85%; CRT: -2.37%), grip strength (IBRT: +5.47%; CRT: +4.02%), RAST (IBRT: -2.67%; CRT: -1.04%), 6 MWT (IBRT: +4.53%; CRT: +2.17%), LF/HF (IBRT: -11.43%; CRT: -5.11%), and RMSSD (IBRT: +5.36%; CRT: +3.81%) (all ≤ 0.01). IBRT produced significantly greater gains in 6 MWT (B = 19.51, 95% CI: 0.79 to 38.23, = 0.04). Both IBRT and CRT effectively improved body composition, muscle strength, speed, functional capacity, and autonomic recovery. However, IBRT demonstrated a superior effect on aerobic capacity.
间歇式抗阻训练(IBRT)和循环抗阻训练(CRT)是旨在增强神经肌肉和代谢适应性的周期化训练模式。本研究旨在评估一项为期12周的IBRT计划与CRT相比,对智利年轻成年人身体成分、肌肉力量、速度、功能能力和自主恢复的影响。对30名参与者进行了一项随机、平行、双盲研究,将他们分为IBRT组(n = 15)或CRT组(n = 15)。评估内容包括体重指数(BMI)、腰围、右手握力、跑步无氧冲刺测试(RAST)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)以及心率变异性(HRV)指标:低频与高频比值(LF/HF)和逐次差值的均方根(RMSSD,一种反映副交感神经活动的时域HRV指标)。统计分析包括t检验和协方差分析。两组在年龄(IBRT组:25.2±3.19;CRT组:23.27±3.69,P = 0.14)和BMI(IBRT组:21.56±2.22;CRT组:22.36±1.70kg/m²,P = 0.40)方面相似。两组在腰围(IBRT组:-1.85%;CRT组:-2.37%)、握力(IBRT组:+5.47%;CRT组:+4.02%)、RAST(IBRT组:-2.67%;CRT组:-1.04%)、6MWT(IBRT组:+4.53%;CRT组:+2.17%)、LF/HF(IBRT组:-11.43%;CRT组:-5.11%)和RMSSD(IBRT组:+5.36%;CRT组:+3.81%)方面均有显著改善(所有P≤0.01)。IBRT在6MWT方面的改善显著更大(B = 19.51,95%置信区间:0.79至38.23,P = 0.04)。IBRT和CRT均有效改善了身体成分、肌肉力量、速度、功能能力和自主恢复。然而,IBRT在有氧能力方面显示出更优越的效果。