• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢骨折中的负重监测装置:一项范围综述

Weight-Bearing Monitoring Devices in Lower Extremity Fractures: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Robinson Jackson, Wang Alice Wei Ting, Stockton David J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Jun 21;17:257-267. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S521013. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/ORR.S521013
PMID:40567937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12191147/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgeons commonly prescribe weight-bearing parameters for their patients for a variety of reasons. Weight-bearing may be limited in order to control the healing environment, but advancing a patient's weight-bearing status is preferably done as quickly as possible to maximize functional recovery. However, it is entirely unclear to what extent these prescriptions are followed in practice. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and compare non-invasive devices used for the measurement of weight-bearing following lower extremity fractures.

METHODS

Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were completed to identify relevant studies. Titles were screened for relevance, and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria. We identified studies that investigated the use of external force, pedal pressure, or activity monitoring devices used in adults after lower extremity fractures and excluded studies involving compartment pressure measurement.

FINDINGS

Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. About 39% of studies used an insole-type device, which could be worn in a shoe or integrated into a removable boot. Other device types included step count or activity monitors (52%), force plates (18%), pressure film (2%) and external pedobarography systems (27%).

INTERPRETATION

We found that different monitors offered varying types of measurements and are suitable for a variety of applications. Therefore, selecting the ideal device depends on the metric of interest. Further high-quality prospective studies utilizing device monitoring are needed to validate the theory that early weight-bearing is beneficial and safe for patients with lower extremity fractures.

摘要

背景

出于多种原因,骨科医生通常会为患者规定负重参数。为了控制愈合环境,负重可能会受到限制,但最好尽快提高患者的负重状态,以最大限度地促进功能恢复。然而,在实际操作中这些规定的遵循程度尚不清楚。本综述的目的是识别和比较用于测量下肢骨折后负重情况的非侵入性设备。

方法

完成了对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)的数据库检索,以识别相关研究。对标题进行相关性筛选,并根据纳入标准对摘要进行筛选。我们纳入了研究下肢骨折后成人使用的外力、踏板压力或活动监测设备的研究,并排除了涉及骨筋膜室压力测量的研究。

结果

62项研究符合纳入标准。约39%的研究使用鞋垫式设备,这种设备可以穿在鞋子里或集成到可拆卸的靴子中。其他设备类型包括步数计数器或活动监测器(52%)、测力板(18%)、压力膜(2%)和外部足底压力测量系统(27%)。

解读

我们发现不同的监测器提供不同类型的测量,适用于各种应用。因此,选择理想的设备取决于感兴趣的指标。需要进一步开展利用设备监测的高质量前瞻性研究,以验证早期负重对下肢骨折患者有益且安全这一理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/12191147/cef44353707d/ORR-17-257-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/12191147/9964b2fe2978/ORR-17-257-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/12191147/cef44353707d/ORR-17-257-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/12191147/9964b2fe2978/ORR-17-257-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a291/12191147/cef44353707d/ORR-17-257-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Weight-Bearing Monitoring Devices in Lower Extremity Fractures: A Scoping Review.下肢骨折中的负重监测装置:一项范围综述
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Jun 21;17:257-267. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S521013. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
5
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
6
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults.成人踝关节骨折的康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD005595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005595.pub3.
7
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.手术与非手术干预治疗移位型关节内跟骨骨折。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 7;11(11):CD008628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008628.pub3.
8
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
9
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
10
Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb.生物工程神经导管和套用于上肢周围神经修复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD012574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012574.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Weight-bearing Guidelines for Common Geriatric Upper and Lower Extremity Fractures.常见老年上肢和下肢骨折的负重指南。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023 Dec;21(6):698-709. doi: 10.1007/s11914-023-00834-2. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
The Hospital to Home study (H2H): smartwatch technology-enabled rehabilitation following hip fracture in older adults, a feasibility non-randomised trial.医院到家研究(H2H):智能手表技术助力老年人髋部骨折后的康复,一项可行性非随机试验。
Future Healthc J. 2023 Mar;10(1):14-20. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2022-0101.
3
Early postoperative step count and walking time have greater impact on lower limb fracture outcomes than load-bearing metrics.
术后早期的步数和行走时间对下肢骨折结局的影响大于承重指标。
Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110756. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.043. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Reliability and Repeatability of the Footwork Plantar Pressure Plate System.足弓压力板系统的可靠性和可重复性。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Dec 15;111(6). doi: 10.7547/18-057.
5
Researching the effects of sleep on step count during the postoperative period.研究术后睡眠对步数的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2990-2992. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17305. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Mid-term outcome of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum after bisegmental transsacral stabilization versus spinopelvic fixation.双侧节段性经骶骨固定与脊柱骨盆固定治疗骶骨脆性骨折的中期疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):462-468. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-1454.R1.
7
Analysis of partial weight bearing after surgical treatment in patients with injuries of the lower extremity.下肢损伤手术后部分负重分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jan;142(1):77-81. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03588-z. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Dynamic Loading Assessment at the Fifth Metatarsal in Elite Athletes With a History of Jones Fracture.精英运动员中琼斯骨折病史的第五跖骨动态加载评估。
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Nov 1;31(6):e321-e326. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000830.
9
Methods for Step Count Data: Determining "Valid" Days and Quantifying Fragmentation of Walking Bouts.计步数据的方法:确定“有效”天数和量化步行片段的碎片化。
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.149. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Monitoring activity of hip injury patients (MoHIP): a sub-study of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation observational cohort study.髋部损伤患者活动监测(MoHIP):世界髋部创伤评估观察性队列研究的一项子研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 22;6:70. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00612-2. eCollection 2020.