• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索对健康保险公司的信任:来自参保者认知与体验的见解

Exploring Trust in Health Insurers: Insights from Enrollees' Perceptions and Experiences.

作者信息

van der Hulst Frank J P, Huijgen Sanne, Brabers Anne E M, de Jong Judith D

机构信息

Nivel, The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The

CAPHRI, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 9;13(2):29. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020029. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.3390/jmahp13020029
PMID:40568384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12193822/
Abstract

Managed competition is a key driver in healthcare systems in countries like Germany, Switzerland, and The Netherlands. Trust in health insurers is vital but currently low in The Netherlands. This may be due to perceptions regarding profit motives, negative experiences, media coverage, and a lack of understanding of insurers' roles. This study explores how enrollees perceive health insurers and how the aforementioned factors contribute to these perceptions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants from the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in March and April 2023. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step method for inductive thematic analysis. Participants generally view health insurers positively in terms of managing finances and ensuring care accessibility. However, some perceive insurers as profit-driven and prioritising cost reduction over individual needs, leading to dissatisfaction. Negative experiences and media coverage also shape these perceptions. Participants believe that insurers should ensure care accessibility and quality, distribute costs fairly, provide guidance, and prioritise preventive measures. To foster trust, insurers should communicate their non-profit status and use of benefits, increase transparency in purchasing decisions, and maintain clear communication about payment obligations. Enhancing communication about their contributions to healthcare and raising awareness of their broader roles may also help build trust.

摘要

管理式竞争是德国、瑞士和荷兰等国医疗体系的关键驱动力。对健康保险公司的信任至关重要,但目前在荷兰这种信任度较低。这可能是由于对利润动机的看法、负面经历、媒体报道以及对保险公司角色缺乏了解所致。本研究探讨了参保人如何看待健康保险公司,以及上述因素如何影响这些看法。2023年3月和4月,对来自荷兰Nivel医疗保健消费者小组的17名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。使用布劳恩和克拉克的六步归纳主题分析法对数据进行了分析。参与者总体上对健康保险公司在财务管理和确保医疗可及性方面持积极看法。然而,一些人认为保险公司受利润驱动,将成本降低置于个人需求之上,从而导致不满。负面经历和媒体报道也影响了这些看法。参与者认为保险公司应确保医疗可及性和质量、公平分摊成本、提供指导并优先采取预防措施。为了增进信任,保险公司应宣传其非营利地位和福利使用情况,提高采购决策的透明度,并就支付义务保持清晰沟通。加强关于其对医疗保健贡献的沟通以及提高对其更广泛作用的认识也可能有助于建立信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/06dccd5ae6ff/jmahp-13-00029-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/7daa7cefd125/jmahp-13-00029-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/c6fb4426be8f/jmahp-13-00029-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/04688a7b7017/jmahp-13-00029-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/06dccd5ae6ff/jmahp-13-00029-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/7daa7cefd125/jmahp-13-00029-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/c6fb4426be8f/jmahp-13-00029-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/04688a7b7017/jmahp-13-00029-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e0/12193822/06dccd5ae6ff/jmahp-13-00029-g0A4.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Trust in Health Insurers: Insights from Enrollees' Perceptions and Experiences.探索对健康保险公司的信任:来自参保者认知与体验的见解
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jun 9;13(2):29. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020029. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The relation between trust and the willingness of enrollees to receive healthcare advice from their health insurer.信任与参保人接受健康保险公司提供的医疗保健建议的意愿之间的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09016-9.
2
Measuring health insurance literacy in the Netherlands - First results of the HILM-NL questionnaire.荷兰医疗保险素养测评——HILM-NL问卷的初步结果
Health Policy. 2022 Nov;126(11):1157-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.
定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
4
National Health Insurance: A conceptual framework from conflicting typologies.全民健康保险:来自冲突类型学的概念框架。
Health Policy. 2019 Jul;123(7):621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 18.
5
Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.健康保险素养与因费用而避免医疗服务之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4796.
6
Low institutional trust in health insurers in Dutch health care.荷兰医疗保健机构对健康保险公司的信任度低。
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):288-292. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Managed competition in the Netherlands: Do insurers have incentives to steer on quality?荷兰的管理式竞争:保险公司是否有动力引导质量?
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review.选择性签约以及将患者引导至首选医疗机构:一项范围综述。
Health Policy. 2017 May;121(5):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Swiss popular initiative for a single health insurer… once again!瑞士关于单一健康保险公司的民众倡议……再次提出!
Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Approaches to Recruiting 'Hard-To-Reach' Populations into Re-search: A Review of the Literature.将“难以触及”人群纳入研究的招募方法:文献综述
Health Promot Perspect. 2011 Dec 20;1(2):86-94. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2011.009. eCollection 2011.