Suppr超能文献

瑞士关于单一健康保险公司的民众倡议……再次提出!

Swiss popular initiative for a single health insurer… once again!

作者信息

De Pietro Carlo, Crivelli Luca

机构信息

Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (DEASS SUPSI), Via Violino 11, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland; CERGAS Bocconi, Milano, Italy.

Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (DEASS SUPSI), Via Violino 11, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland; Institute of Economics, Università della Svizzera italiana (IdEP USI) and Swiss School of Public Health+, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14.

Abstract

The article describes a recent Swiss popular initiative, aiming to replace the current system of statutory health insurance run by 61 competing private insurers with a new system run by a single public insurer. Despite the rejection of the initiative by 62% of voters in late September 2014, the campaign and ballot results are interesting because they show the importance of (effective) public communication in shaping the outcome of a popular ballot. The relevance of the Swiss case goes beyond the peculiarities of its federalism and direct democracy and might be useful for other countries debating the pros and cons of national unitary health insurance systems versus models using multiple insurers. After this electoral ballot, the project to establish a public sickness fund in Switzerland seems definitely stopped, at least for the next decade. Insurers, who opposed the initiative, have effectively fed the "fear of change" of the population and have stressed the good outcomes of the Swiss healthcare system. However, the political pressure favoured by the popular initiative opened a "windows of opportunity" and led the federal Parliament to pass a stricter regulation of health insurers, improving in this way the current system.

摘要

这篇文章描述了瑞士最近的一项民众倡议,旨在用一个由单一公共保险公司运营的新体系取代当前由61家相互竞争的私人保险公司运营的法定医疗保险体系。尽管该倡议在2014年9月底遭到了62%选民的否决,但这场运动和投票结果仍很有意思,因为它们显示了(有效的)公众沟通在决定民众投票结果方面的重要性。瑞士案例的相关性超出了其联邦制和直接民主的特殊性,可能对其他正在辩论国家单一医疗保险体系与多保险公司模式利弊的国家有用。在这次选举投票之后,在瑞士建立公共疾病基金的项目似乎肯定停止了,至少在未来十年内如此。反对该倡议的保险公司有效地加剧了民众的“变革恐惧”,并强调了瑞士医疗体系的良好成果。然而,民众倡议所带来的政治压力打开了一个“机会之窗”,并促使联邦议会通过了对健康保险公司更严格的监管,从而改进了当前体系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验