• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国分散式临床试验中参与者与研究地点认知的比较

Comparison of Participant and Site Perceptions of Decentralized Clinical Trials in the USA.

作者信息

Barge Roland, Floody Patrick

机构信息

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Mar 3;3(2):100201. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100201. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100201
PMID:40568604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12190979/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define potential participant and site perceptions of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Two qualitative surveys were conducted between January 2022 and August 2022 to assess current awareness of, and perceptions about, DCTs. The first survey received 141 responses from staff at our clinical trial sites; the second survey received 481 responses from US-based healthy individuals or those living with an illness.

RESULTS

There was a difference in perceptions and willingness between participants and sites toward DCTs. Participants expressed more comfort with hybrid and fully remote trials than did the sites. Site staff were more concerned and less trusting than participants of DCTs; participants' main concerns were regarding practicality and medical safety, whereas the focus for sites was on burden, trust, and security. Both sites and participants expressed confidence in fully remote clinical study activities when they have appropriate support; sites were less tolerant of fully remote clinical study activities if professional support was not provided. Overall, sites were more willing to manage the use of DCT-related technologies than were participants. It is highly likely that participants' willingness to manage DCT technologies relates to the perceived burden of use (ie, willingness decreases as burden or impact on daily life increases). Sponsors, contract research organizations, and DCT vendors generally had positive views on DCTs. However, different stakeholders had different concerns.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the need for collaborative research and development of DCTs, as well as a clear DCT framework and regulatory guidance.

摘要

目的

明确潜在参与者和研究地点对去中心化临床试验(DCT)的看法。

参与者与方法

在2022年1月至2022年8月期间进行了两项定性调查,以评估当前对DCT的认识和看法。第一项调查收到了来自我们临床试验地点工作人员的141份回复;第二项调查收到了来自美国健康个体或患病个体的481份回复。

结果

参与者和研究地点对DCT的看法和意愿存在差异。与研究地点相比,参与者对混合式和完全远程试验表现出更高的舒适度。研究地点的工作人员比DCT的参与者更担忧且信任度更低;参与者主要关注实用性和医疗安全性,而研究地点关注的重点是负担、信任和安全性。当获得适当支持时,研究地点和参与者都对完全远程的临床研究活动表示有信心;如果未提供专业支持,研究地点对完全远程的临床研究活动的容忍度较低。总体而言,研究地点比参与者更愿意管理DCT相关技术的使用。参与者管理DCT技术的意愿很可能与感知到的使用负担有关(即随着负担或对日常生活的影响增加,意愿降低)。申办方、合同研究组织和DCT供应商通常对DCT持积极看法。然而,不同利益相关者有不同的担忧。

结论

这些结果凸显了对DCT进行合作研发的必要性,以及明确的DCT框架和监管指南的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/2b8328c14aa1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/380ef2014c5d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/c327596a7dc9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/3d27628dc6b9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/aecfab767e19/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/2b8328c14aa1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/380ef2014c5d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/c327596a7dc9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/3d27628dc6b9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/aecfab767e19/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1279/12190979/2b8328c14aa1/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Participant and Site Perceptions of Decentralized Clinical Trials in the USA.美国分散式临床试验中参与者与研究地点认知的比较
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Mar 3;3(2):100201. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100201. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Use and Acceptance of Digital Communication Technology by Older Adults for Social Connectedness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study.老年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用和接受数字通信技术进行社交联系的情况:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 2;25:e41535. doi: 10.2196/41535.
2
Equitable Access to Clinical Trials: How Do We Achieve It?公平获得临床试验的机会:我们如何实现?
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2023 May;43:e389838. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_389838.
3
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): A few ethical considerations.
去中心化临床试验(DCTs):几点伦理考虑。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:1081150. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1081150. eCollection 2022.
4
A systematic review of measurement methods used to estimate fluid and beverage intake in free-living, working-age adults.一项系统评价,评估了用于估计自由生活、工作年龄成年人液体和饮料摄入量的测量方法。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Aug;36(4):1368-1389. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13127. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
5
Clinical trial participation in America: The roles of eHealth engagement and patient-provider communication.美国的临床试验参与情况:电子健康参与和医患沟通的作用。
Digit Health. 2021 Dec 14;7:20552076211067658. doi: 10.1177/20552076211067658. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Enhancing Patient Centricity and Advancing Innovation in Clinical Research with Virtual Randomized Clinical Trials (vRCTs).通过虚拟随机临床试验(vRCTs)增强以患者为中心的理念并推动临床研究创新。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2):151. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020151.
7
Legal, Regulatory, and Practical Issues to Consider When Adopting Decentralized Clinical Trials: Recommendations From the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.采用去中心化临床试验时需要考虑的法律、监管和实际问题:来自临床试验转化倡议的建议。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jul;54(4):779-787. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00006-4. Epub 2019 Dec 9.