Celik E, Ozcan G, Vatansever C, Paerhati E, Uygur L, Unal C, Guler Cekic S, Ozten M A, Gürsoy A, Keskin Ö, Turgal M, Gursoy T, Can F
School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1002/uog.29269.
A short cervix is a known risk factor for preterm birth, and imbalances in the vaginal microbiome, such as low relative abundance of Lactobacillus, may be associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the vaginal microbiome between women with a short cervix and those with normal cervical length in the second trimester. Additionally, we aimed to assess longitudinal changes in microbial diversity during pregnancy, as well as the impact of vaginal progesterone treatment on vaginal microenvironment in women with a short cervix.
This was a prospective, longitudinal study conducted at Koc University Hospital between January 2020 and May 2023, in women with a singleton pregnancy with a short cervical length (≤ 25 mm) in the second trimester (20 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks' gestation). After diagnosis of short cervix, administration of 200 mg vaginal progesterone daily was initiated. The control group comprised women with a normal cervical length (> 25 mm) in the second trimester, matched for age and body mass index (BMI). Cervicovaginal swabs were collected from the posterior fornix at three gestational-age ranges: in the first trimester (11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks), the second trimester (20 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks) and the third trimester (28 + 0 to 34 + 6 weeks), and cervical length was measured following sample collection. DNA was extracted and the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was sequenced to analyze and compare the vaginal microbiome between women with a short cervix and controls. We also assessed the microbiome longitudinally in each group, across the first, second and third trimesters. In the short-cervix group, we also compared the microbiome before initiation of progesterone treatment in the second trimester and 4 weeks after its initiation.
Among 490 pregnant women who underwent first-trimester screening during the study period and had vaginal swabs collected, short cervical length was detected in 31 at the second-trimester scan. These women formed the study group. A further 27 women, with a normal cervical length, were matched for BMI and age and assigned to the control group. During the second trimester, women with a short cervix exhibited greater species diversity compared with the control group; this was suggested by the higher Shannon index (0.45 vs 0.33; P = 0.135), which reflects species richness and evenness, and further demonstrated by the higher Chao index (20.2 vs 13.8; P = 0.018), which estimates species richness. In the second trimester, Lactobacillus was less abundant in women with a short cervix than in the control group, although the difference did not reach significance (86.8% vs 95.5%; P = 0.091). At the phylum level, in women with a short cervix compared to those with normal cervical length, the relative abundance of Firmicutes, to which the genus Lactobacillus belongs, was significantly lower (90.7% vs 97.6%; P = 0.041), while the relative abundances of both Bacteroidota (1.73% vs 0.4%; P = 0.004) and Proteobacteria (0.2% vs 0.01%; P = 0.007) were higher. In the second trimester, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus gasseri was significantly lower in women with a short cervix compared to controls (4.7% vs 13.8%; P = 0.023). In the longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microbiome, there were no significant differences among the trimesters in the control group. In contrast, in those with a short cervix, there was a notable decrease in the amount of Lactobacillus crispatus, from 55.0% in the first trimester to 36.1% in the second trimester (P = 0.052). In women with a short cervix, there was no significant difference in bacterial diversity after vs before progesterone treatment (Chao index, 22.6 vs 20.5; P = 0.609).
These findings highlight the significant alterations in the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women with a short cervix in comparison to those with normal cervical length, particularly in terms of higher species diversity and distinct community composition. The study also shows that vaginal progesterone treatment in women with a short cervix does not alter the vaginal microbiome, suggesting that it is a safe and effective intervention without disrupting the vaginal microbial balance. Understanding the relationship between cervical length and the vaginal microbiome is essential for developing strategies to reduce the risk of preterm birth in high-risk populations. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
宫颈短是早产的已知危险因素,阴道微生物群失衡,如乳酸杆菌相对丰度低,可能与早产风险增加有关。本研究的目的是评估孕中期宫颈短的女性与宫颈长度正常的女性之间阴道微生物群的差异。此外,我们旨在评估孕期微生物多样性的纵向变化,以及阴道孕激素治疗对宫颈短的女性阴道微环境的影响。
这是一项前瞻性纵向研究,于2020年1月至2023年5月在科克大学医院进行,研究对象为单胎妊娠且孕中期宫颈长度短(≤25mm)(妊娠20+0至24+6周)的女性。诊断为宫颈短后,开始每日阴道给予200mg孕激素。对照组由孕中期宫颈长度正常(>25mm)、年龄和体重指数(BMI)匹配的女性组成。在三个孕周范围从后穹窿采集宫颈阴道拭子:孕早期(11+0至13+6周)、孕中期(20+0至24+6周)和孕晚期(28+0至34+6周),采集样本后测量宫颈长度。提取DNA并对16S rRNA细菌基因进行测序,以分析和比较宫颈短的女性与对照组之间的阴道微生物群。我们还纵向评估了每组在孕早期、孕中期和孕晚期的微生物群。在宫颈短组中,我们还比较了孕中期孕激素治疗开始前和开始后4周的微生物群。
在研究期间接受孕早期筛查并采集阴道拭子的490名孕妇中,孕中期超声检查发现31名宫颈长度短。这些女性组成研究组。另外27名宫颈长度正常的女性,根据BMI和年龄匹配,被分配到对照组。孕中期,宫颈短的女性与对照组相比表现出更高的物种多样性;反映物种丰富度和均匀度的香农指数更高(0.45对0.33;P=0.135)表明了这一点,估计物种丰富度的 Chao指数更高(20.2对13.8;P=0.018)进一步证明了这一点。孕中期,宫颈短的女性中乳酸杆菌的丰度低于对照组,尽管差异未达到显著水平(86.8%对95.5%;P=0.091)。在门水平上,与宫颈长度正常的女性相比,宫颈短的女性中乳酸杆菌所属的厚壁菌门的相对丰度显著较低(90.7%对97.6%;P=0.041),而拟杆菌门(1.73%对0.4%;P=0.004)和变形菌门(0.2%对0.01%;P=0.007)的相对丰度均较高。孕中期,与对照组相比,宫颈短的女性中加氏乳杆菌的相对丰度显著较低(4.7%对13.8%;P=0.023)。在阴道微生物群的纵向分析中,对照组各孕周之间无显著差异。相比之下,在宫颈短的女性中,卷曲乳杆菌的数量从孕早期的55.0%显著下降至孕中期的36.1%(P=0.052)。在宫颈短的女性中,孕激素治疗前后细菌多样性无显著差异(Chao指数,22.6对20.5;P=0.609)。
这些发现突出了宫颈短的孕妇与宫颈长度正常的孕妇相比,阴道微生物群存在显著改变,特别是在物种多样性更高和群落组成不同方面。该研究还表明,宫颈短的女性阴道孕激素治疗不会改变阴道微生物群,表明它是一种安全有效的干预措施,不会破坏阴道微生物平衡。了解宫颈长度与阴道微生物群之间的关系对于制定降低高危人群早产风险的策略至关重要。©2025作者。《妇产科超声》由约翰·威利父子有限公司代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。