Suppr超能文献

用于识别左束支夺获的新心电图形态学标准。

New ECG Morphologic Criteria for the Identification of Left Bundle Branch Capture.

作者信息

Cano Óscar, Arveras Carmen, Navarrete Javier, Jover Pablo, Soriano Valero, Robles Enrique, Navarro Josep, Izquierdo Maite, Osca Joaquín, Martínez-Dolz Luis, Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi

机构信息

Hospital Universitario i Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas en RED en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.

Hospital Universitario i Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.05.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of left bundle branch capture (LBBc) during left bundle branch area pacing remains challenging.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to validate the utility of new simple morphologic criteria for the identification of LBBc.

METHODS

Patients with proven LBBc based on the presence of QRS transition during decremental output pacing were included. The paced V QRS upstroke/downstroke was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated, and classified as fast or slow, with fast upstroke patterns associated with LBBc and slow upstroke patterns with left ventricular septal capture (LVSc). Additionally, the appearance of a paced QRS downstroke slurring/notching in any lead not previously present during lead penetration and/or an "M" QRS pattern in inferior leads was also considered suggestive of LBBc. Accuracy of these criteria was tested by independent evaluators using exclusively qualitative electrocardiogram morphologic features.

RESULTS

115 patients with proven LBBc were included. Mean V QRS upstroke duration during LBBc was significantly shorter than during LVSc (34.6 ± 10.1 ms vs 63.2 ± 12.1 ms; P < 0.001). A paced V upstroke/downstroke ratio <1 had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 and 0.95 for the identification of LBBc. A slurred/notched QRS downstroke or "M" pattern in inferior leads was present in 91.1% during LBBc in baseline narrow QRS patients with inferior paced QRS axis, with sensitivity and specificity being 0.91 and 0.87, respectively. Using exclusively qualitative criteria, independent evaluators were able to identify the correct capture pattern in 87% of LBBc and 89% of LVSc cases, with diagnostic accuracy being significantly lower among dilated cardiomyopathy patients: 70.4% vs 93%; P = 0.004.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple electrocardiogram morphologic criteria can accurately identify LBBc during left bundle branch area pacing in patients with baseline narrow QRS and/or without cardiomyopathy.

摘要

背景

在左束支区域起搏过程中识别左束支激动(LBBc)仍然具有挑战性。

目的

本研究旨在验证用于识别LBBc的新的简单形态学标准的实用性。

方法

纳入基于递减输出起搏时QRS波移行情况证实为LBBc的患者。对起搏的V波QRS波上升支/下降支进行定量和定性评估,并分为快速或缓慢,快速上升支模式与LBBc相关,缓慢上升支模式与左心室间隔激动(LVSc)相关。此外,在任何导联中出现起搏QRS波下降支切迹/顿挫(在电极插入过程中之前未出现)和/或下壁导联中的“M”型QRS波形态也提示为LBBc。独立评估者仅使用定性心电图形态学特征来测试这些标准的准确性。

结果

纳入115例经证实为LBBc的患者。LBBc期间的平均V波QRS波上升支持续时间显著短于LVSc期间(34.6±10.1毫秒对63.2±12.1毫秒;P<0.001)。起搏的V波上升支/下降支比率<1对识别LBBc的敏感性和特异性分别为0.97和0.95。在基线QRS波窄且下壁起搏QRS波电轴的患者中,LBBc期间91.1%的患者下壁导联出现QRS波下降支切迹/顿挫或“M”型,敏感性和特异性分别为0.91和0.87。仅使用定性标准,独立评估者能够在87%的LBBc病例和89%的LVSc病例中识别出正确的激动模式,在扩张型心肌病患者中的诊断准确性显著较低:分别为70.4%和93%;P=0.004。

结论

简单的心电图形态学标准可准确识别基线QRS波窄和/或无心肌病患者左束支区域起搏期间的LBBc。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验