Kalra Love-Preet, Zylyftari Sabina, Blums Kristaps, Barthelmes Stephan, Baum Hannsjoerg, Meckel Stephan, Heilgeist Andreas, Luger Sebastian, Foerch Christian
Department of Neurology, RKH Klinikum, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Transfusion Medicine, RKH Regionale Kliniken Holding und Services GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Neurology. 2025 Jul 22;105(2):e213823. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213823. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
The rapid identification of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with symptoms of acute stroke is decisive for prehospital triage and initiation of targeted therapies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a highly promising blood-biomarker indicating ICH. In this study, we investigated the potential of a new GFAP test run on a point-of-care platform for distinguishing ICH from ischemic stroke (IS) and stroke mimics (SM) in the prehospital phase.
This prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, a tertiary care hospital in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Patients with symptoms of acute stroke admitted within 6 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. Blood samples were collected in the prehospital phase. Plasma GFAP measurements were performed on the i-STAT-Alinity device (duration: 15 minutes) in-hospital. The gold standard was the final diagnosis categorized ICH, IS, or SM.
A total of 353 patients were enrolled (mean age 74.6 ± 13.4 years; 46.7% female). GFAP concentrations were elevated in patients with ICH (n = 76; median 208 pg/mL [interquartile range 60-5,907]) compared with IS (n = 258; 30 pg/mL [29-51]) and SM (n = 19; 48 pg/mL [29-97]; < 0.001). The optimal GFAP cutoff point to differentiate ICH from IS and SM was 55 pg/mL (area under the curve of 0.880, 95% CI 0.834-0.925, < 0.001). IS and SM GFAP levels slightly increased in parallel with increasing age. Hence, different GFAP cutoff points were determined to identify ICH across 3 age groups with moderate to high positive predictive values (PPVs) (90.0%-95.5%; minimum lower CI 55.0%, maximum upper CI 99.3%) (sensitivity values 56.3%-72.4%, specificity values 98.9%-99.0% and negative predictive values [NPVs] 87.5%-92.7%). Vice versa, in patients with a moderate to severe neurologic deficit (NIH Stroke Scale >6), GFAP values <30 pg/mL ruled out ICH with a NPV of 100.0%.
Laboratory GFAP measurements on a point-of-care platform in blood samples collected from patients with symptoms of acute stroke in the prehospital phase can help to identify ICH with moderate to high PPV. Following confirmation in larger independent cohorts using optimized eligibility criteria and validated age-specific cutoff values, GFAP testing could facilitate optimized triage and the initiation of blood pressure-lowering therapy and anticoagulation reversal in earlier time frames.
This study provides Class II evidence that elevated plasma GFAP levels within 6 hours of symptom onset accurately distinguish patients with ICH from IS and SM.
对于急性卒中症状患者,快速识别脑出血(ICH)对于院前分诊和启动靶向治疗至关重要。胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是一种极具前景的提示ICH的血液生物标志物。在本研究中,我们调查了在即时检测平台上进行的新型GFAP检测在院前阶段区分ICH与缺血性卒中(IS)及卒中模拟病(SM)的潜力。
这项前瞻性诊断准确性研究在德国巴登-符腾堡州路德维希堡的RKH Klinikum进行,该医院为三级医疗机构。纳入症状发作6小时内入院的急性卒中症状患者。院前阶段采集血样。入院后在i-STAT-Alinity设备上进行血浆GFAP检测(耗时:15分钟)。金标准为最终诊断分类为ICH、IS或SM。
共纳入353例患者(平均年龄74.6±13.4岁;46.7%为女性)。与IS(n = 258;30 pg/mL [29 - 51])和SM(n = 19;48 pg/mL [29 - 97];P < 0.001)相比,ICH患者(n = 76;中位数208 pg/mL [四分位间距60 - 5907])的GFAP浓度升高。区分ICH与IS及SM的最佳GFAP临界值为55 pg/mL(曲线下面积为0.880,95%可信区间0.834 - 0.925,P < 0.001)。IS和SM的GFAP水平随年龄增长略有平行升高。因此,确定了不同的GFAP临界值以在3个年龄组中识别ICH,具有中度至高阳性预测值(PPV)(90.0% - 95.5%;最低下限可信区间55.0%,最高上限可信区间99.3%)(敏感度值56.3% - 72.4%,特异度值98.9% - 99.0%,阴性预测值[NPV] 87.5% - 92.7%)。反之,在中度至重度神经功能缺损(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表>6)的患者中,GFAP值<30 pg/mL排除ICH的NPV为100.0%。
在院前阶段对急性卒中症状患者采集的血样在即时检测平台上进行实验室GFAP检测有助于以中度至高PPV识别ICH。在使用优化的纳入标准和经过验证的年龄特异性临界值的更大独立队列中得到证实后,GFAP检测可促进优化分诊以及在更早时间范围内启动降压治疗和抗凝逆转。
本研究提供二级证据表明症状发作6小时内血浆GFAP水平升高可准确区分ICH患者与IS及SM患者。