Sá Rick, Pignataro Neto G
National Institute of Applied Naturopathy (INNAP), Rio Grande do Sul, 93315-040, Brazil; Saint Thomas Aquinas University (STAU), Orlando, FL, 32835, USA.
Postgraduate program in Neuroscience and Childhood, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, 80210-170, Brazil.
Explore (NY). 2025 Jul-Aug;21(4):103198. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2025.103198. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence and emerging models that explain how energy-based interventions may influence biological systems, with particular emphasis on the roles of ultraweak photon emissions (UPEs). Additionally, through this synthesis, we seek to propose a plausible biophysical mechanism of biocommunication that may underlie the effects observed in Biofield Therapies (BTs).
We conducted a comprehensive literature review of preclinical (in vitro and in vivo) and clinical studies on BTs, Electromagnetic Therapies modalities, and photon-mediated biocommunication. Additionally, we examined theoretical models from biophysics and quantum spin dynamics to explore plausible mechanisms underlying nonlocal biological effects.
Clinical and preclinical evidence suggests that BTs and Electromagnetic Therapies interventions modulate pain, inflammation, immune responses, and oxidative stress. UPEs emerge as sensitive biomarkers of physiological coherence and may mediate photonic signaling both within and between biological systems. Recent theoretical advances indicate that long-range spin-mediated coherence and photon-sucking mechanisms may contribute to our understanding of biocommunication, potentially enabling spectral- and coherence-dependent therapeutic effects.
In particular, Electromagnetic Therapies demonstrate clinically relevant effects in modulating inflammation, pain, and tissue repair, supported by both mechanistic insights and clinical evidence. More broadly, energy-based interventions such as BTs show promise in influencing biological regulation, supposedly through coherent photonic and electromagnetic processes. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms could strengthen the scientific foundation and clinical application of energy medicine approaches. Further experimental validation is essential to elucidate, for example, the role of BTs at both short and long distances and their potential therapeutic outcomes.
本叙述性综述旨在综合当前的证据和新兴模型,以解释基于能量的干预措施如何影响生物系统,特别强调超微弱光子发射(UPEs)的作用。此外,通过这一综合分析,我们试图提出一种合理的生物物理生物通信机制,该机制可能是生物场疗法(BTs)中所观察到的效应的基础。
我们对关于BTs、电磁疗法模式和光子介导的生物通信的临床前(体外和体内)及临床研究进行了全面的文献综述。此外,我们研究了生物物理学和量子自旋动力学的理论模型,以探索非局部生物效应背后的合理机制。
临床和临床前证据表明,BTs和电磁疗法干预可调节疼痛、炎症、免疫反应和氧化应激。UPEs作为生理相干性的敏感生物标志物出现,并可能在生物系统内部和之间介导光子信号。最近的理论进展表明,远程自旋介导的相干性和光子吸收机制可能有助于我们对生物通信的理解,潜在地实现光谱和相干性依赖的治疗效果。
特别是,电磁疗法在调节炎症、疼痛和组织修复方面显示出临床相关效应,这得到了机制见解和临床证据的支持。更广泛地说,诸如BTs等基于能量的干预措施在影响生物调节方面显示出前景,据推测是通过相干光子和电磁过程。对这些机制的更深入理解可以加强能量医学方法的科学基础和临床应用。进一步的实验验证对于阐明例如BTs在短距离和长距离的作用及其潜在治疗结果至关重要。