Suppr超能文献

小气道功能障碍的检测指标能否有助于哮喘急性加重的诊断或管理?一项系统评价。

Can measures of small airway dysfunction aid with the diagnosis or management of asthma exacerbations? A systematic review.

作者信息

Alshehri Abdulrahman, Alshahrani Mohammed Ibrahim, Sapey Elizabeth, Stockley Robert Andrew, Almeshari Mohammed

机构信息

The Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Health Rehabilitaion Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jun 26;12(1):e002926. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002926.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma exacerbations are acute episodes with worsened symptoms and decreased lung function. Current diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and spirometry, lacking a gold standard test. Interest in small airways tests suggests they may identify treatable traits. This review examines evidence for using small airways tests in diagnosing and managing exacerbations.

METHODS

The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the systematic review followed standard methodology. Multiple electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library). The search strategy combined subject headings and keywords related to asthma exacerbations and small airway function tests. Observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing these tests for detecting or monitoring exacerbations in adults (≥18 years) were included, without language or date restrictions. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for RCTs.

RESULTS

Seven studies (six observational, one RCT) met the inclusion criteria. Five included forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75), also referred to as maximal mid-expiratory flow; one used isolated forced expiratory flow measures (FEF25, FEF50 and FEF75); and one included multiple breath washout (MBW). No study specifically tested whether small airway function tests improved the diagnosis or monitoring of exacerbations. However, all showed worsening small airway measures during exacerbations, which improved on recovery. FEF25-75 showed greater percentage change than forced expiratory volume in one second postrecovery. The MBW study reported increased acinar ventilation heterogeneity (Sacin) and conductive ventilation heterogeneity (Scond), suggesting small airway involvement.

CONCLUSION

Conducting physiological tests for small airway function appears feasible during an exacerbation. These tests may have utility in the diagnosis or monitoring of acute asthma exacerbations. However, existing studies are heterogeneous and further research is needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024494994.

摘要

背景

哮喘急性发作是症状加重和肺功能下降的急性发作。目前的诊断依赖于临床评估和肺功能测定,缺乏金标准检测方法。对小气道检测的关注表明它们可能识别出可治疗的特征。本综述探讨了使用小气道检测来诊断和管理急性发作的证据。

方法

该方案已在PROSPERO上进行前瞻性注册,系统综述遵循标准方法。检索了多个电子数据库,包括MEDLINE(Ovid)、EMBASE(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(Cochrane图书馆)。检索策略结合了与哮喘急性发作和小气道功能检测相关的主题词和关键词。纳入了评估这些检测在成人(≥18岁)中检测或监测急性发作的观察性研究和随机对照试验(RCT),无语言或日期限制。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估观察性研究的偏倚风险,使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估RCT的偏倚风险。

结果

七项研究(六项观察性研究,一项RCT)符合纳入标准。五项研究纳入了用力肺活量25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量(FEF25-75),也称为最大呼气中期流量;一项研究使用了单独的用力呼气流量测量值(FEF25、FEF50和FEF75);一项研究纳入了多次呼吸冲洗(MBW)。没有研究专门测试小气道功能检测是否能改善急性发作的诊断或监测。然而,所有研究均显示急性发作期间小气道指标恶化,恢复时有所改善。FEF25-75在恢复后一秒用力呼气容积的百分比变化更大。MBW研究报告腺泡通气异质性(Sacin)和传导性通气异质性(Scond)增加,提示小气道受累。

结论

在急性发作期间进行小气道功能的生理检测似乎是可行的。这些检测可能在急性哮喘发作的诊断或监测中具有实用价值。然而,现有研究存在异质性,需要进一步研究。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024494994。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b321/12207187/a0fac8b266b2/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验