Gehrke Sergio Alexandre, Scarano Antonio, Lorusso Felice, Balduino Thalles Yurgen, Bianchini Marco Aurélio
Department of Implantology, Bioface/Postgrados en Odontología/Universidad Catolica de Murcia, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay.
Department of Biotechnology, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 5;61(6):1041. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061041.
This study aimed to evaluate marginal bone level (MBL) changes in implant-supported rehabilitation based on patient demographics, implant location, transmucosal abutment height, and crown emergence profile. : A total of 50 patients (28 females and 22 males), with 111 implant-abutment (IA) sets, were analyzed. The mean age was 65.2 ± 10.9 years (range: 33-81). Implants were placed in the maxilla (68.5%) and mandible (31.5%), with an average evaluation period of 12.7 ± 4.1 months. MBL changes at mesial (MBLm) and distal (MBLd) sites were recorded and analyzed based on sex, age, implant location, abutment transmucosal height, and crown emergence profile. Statistical comparisons were performed using Bonferroni's multiple comparison test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. : MBL changes did not show significant differences based on sex ( > 0.05) or age group ( > 0.05). However, maxillary implants exhibited greater bone loss than mandibular implants, though this difference was not statistically significant. Transmucosal abutment height (TMh) significantly influenced MBL, with taller abutments (TMh3: -1.07 ± 0.93 mm) showing less bone loss than shorter abutments (TMh1: -2.11 ± 1.82 mm) ( < 0.05). Crown emergence profile also affected MBL, particularly in the distal emergence profile, where design 1 exhibited the least bone loss compared to designs 2 and 3 ( = 0.0176). : The study findings suggest that transmucosal abutment height and crown emergence profile significantly influence peri-implant bone stability. Transmucosal abutment height (> 2.5 mm) was associated with reduced bone loss. Further research is recommended to evaluate the long-term effects on peri-implant bone maintenance.
本研究旨在基于患者人口统计学特征、种植体位置、穿龈基台高度和牙冠龈缘外形,评估种植体支持修复中边缘骨水平(MBL)的变化。:共分析了50例患者(28例女性和22例男性)的111套种植体 - 基台(IA)。平均年龄为65.2±10.9岁(范围:33 - 81岁)。种植体植入上颌(68.5%)和下颌(31.5%),平均评估期为12.7±4.1个月。根据性别、年龄、种植体位置、基台穿龈高度和牙冠龈缘外形,记录并分析近中(MBLm)和远中(MBLd)部位的MBL变化。采用Bonferroni多重比较检验和带有Tukey事后检验的单因素方差分析进行统计学比较。:MBL变化在性别(>0.05)或年龄组(>0.05)方面未显示出显著差异。然而,上颌种植体的骨吸收比下颌种植体更多,尽管这种差异无统计学意义。穿龈基台高度(TMh)对MBL有显著影响,较高的基台(TMh3:-1.07±0.93 mm)显示出比短基台(TMh1:-2.11±1.82 mm)更少的骨吸收(<0.05)。牙冠龈缘外形也影响MBL,特别是在远中龈缘外形方面,与设计2和3相比,设计1的骨吸收最少(=0.0176)。:研究结果表明,穿龈基台高度和牙冠龈缘外形对种植体周围骨稳定性有显著影响。穿龈基台高度(>2.5 mm)与骨吸收减少相关。建议进一步研究以评估对种植体周围骨维持的长期影响。