Robinson Laura A, Cavanah Aidan M, Lennon Sarah, Mattingly Madison L, Anglin Derick A, Boersma Melissa D, Roberts Michael D, Frugé Andrew Dandridge
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
College of Nursing, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 6;17(12):1946. doi: 10.3390/nu17121946.
Previous research indicates that gastrointestinal discomfort from milk consumption may be attributable to A1 β-casein, rather than lactose intolerance alone. A2 milk (free of A1 β-casein) consumption may result in fewer symptoms compared to conventional milk containing both A1/A2 β-casein. In this five-week, double-blind, double-crossover study, we assessed the physiological responses to doses escalating in volume of lactose-free conventional milk (Lactaid), A2 milk, and lactose-free A2 milk in fluid milk-avoiding participants. Each milk type was consumed over three separate weeks with three increasing doses across five days per week, >one week washout. Gastrointestinal symptoms, blood glucose, and breath gases were monitored for twenty-four, two-, and three-hours post-consumption, respectively. Sensory evaluation was completed for each sample. Fifty-three participants consented and were randomized, with forty-eight participants completing the study. Overall, symptoms were minimal. On Days 1 and 3, lower ratings of bloating and flatulence were observed in A2 compared to lactose-free A2. Breath hydrogen responses reflected lactose content, but were higher in lactose-free A2 than Lactaid on Day 5. Thirty-three participants were deemed lactose-intolerant and had higher fasting and average breath hydrogen for all samples. The only symptom corresponding to the increase in breath hydrogen among these participants was flatulence after A2 consumption. Surprisingly, flatulence was apparently higher for lactose-tolerant individuals when consuming Lactaid compared to A2. These findings suggest that adults who avoid conventional fluid milk consumption may experience minimal GI discomfort from lactose-free and/or A1-free milks.
先前的研究表明,饮用牛奶引起的胃肠道不适可能归因于A1β-酪蛋白,而不仅仅是乳糖不耐受。与同时含有A1/A2β-酪蛋白的传统牛奶相比,饮用A2牛奶(不含A1β-酪蛋白)可能会减少症状。在这项为期五周的双盲、双交叉研究中,我们评估了避免饮用液态奶的参与者对无乳糖传统牛奶(乐纯)、A2牛奶和无乳糖A2牛奶剂量增加的生理反应。每种牛奶类型在三个不同的星期内饮用,每周五天有三个递增剂量,中间有一周的洗脱期。分别在饮用后24小时、2小时和3小时监测胃肠道症状、血糖和呼出气体。对每个样本进行感官评价。53名参与者同意并被随机分组,48名参与者完成了研究。总体而言,症状轻微。在第1天和第3天,与无乳糖A2牛奶相比,饮用A2牛奶的参与者腹胀和肠胃胀气的评分较低。呼气氢气反应反映了乳糖含量,但在第5天,无乳糖A2牛奶的呼气氢气反应高于乐纯。33名参与者被认为是乳糖不耐受者,所有样本的空腹和平均呼气氢气含量都较高。在这些参与者中,与呼气氢气增加相对应的唯一症状是饮用A2牛奶后肠胃胀气。令人惊讶的是,与饮用A2牛奶相比,乳糖耐受个体饮用乐纯时肠胃胀气明显更严重。这些发现表明,避免饮用传统液态奶的成年人饮用无乳糖和/或不含A1的牛奶时,胃肠道不适可能最小。