• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留性功能的根治性前列腺切除术:前100例的病理结果

Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases.

作者信息

Eggleston J C, Walsh P C

出版信息

J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1146-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47661-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47661-0
PMID:4057406
Abstract

In an effort to preserve sexual function, a nerve-sparing technique for radical retropubic prostatectomy has been used in 100 consecutive men with clinically localized prostatic cancer. Each gland was submitted for total histological examination in a way that permitted determination of the extent of the tumor and adequacy of surgical margins. Although 41 patients had established tumor in periprostatic tissue only 7 had positive surgical margins: all 7 had extensive extraprostatic involvement by tumor, while 5 had involvement of the seminal vesicles and none had surgical margins positive only at the site of the nerve-sparing modification. Sexual function was evaluated in 60 of the patients who were potent preoperatively and who have been followed for a minimum of 1 year: 84 per cent of the patients with an intact prostatic capsule were potent compared to 43 per cent with extensive involvement of periprostatic tissue and 33 per cent with involvement of the seminal vesicles or pelvic lymph nodes. Based upon our findings there is no indication that the nerve-sparing modification compromises the adequacy of the removal of the cancer, which is determined primarily by the extent of the tumor rather than the operative technique. Thus, it appears possible to preserve sexual function in a majority of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without compromising the adequacy of the cancer operation.

摘要

为了保留性功能,一种保留神经的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术技术已应用于100例连续的临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者。每个腺体均进行了全组织学检查,以便确定肿瘤范围和手术切缘是否足够。虽然41例患者仅在前列腺周围组织中有明确的肿瘤,但只有7例手术切缘阳性:所有7例均有广泛的前列腺外肿瘤侵犯,5例有精囊侵犯,且无仅在保留神经改良部位手术切缘阳性的情况。对60例术前有性功能且随访至少1年的患者进行了性功能评估:前列腺包膜完整的患者中84%仍有性功能,而前列腺周围组织广泛侵犯的患者为43%,精囊或盆腔淋巴结侵犯的患者为33%。根据我们的研究结果,没有迹象表明保留神经的改良会损害癌症切除的充分性,癌症切除的充分性主要取决于肿瘤范围而非手术技术。因此,在大多数接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中,似乎有可能在不影响癌症手术充分性的情况下保留性功能。

相似文献

1
Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases.保留性功能的根治性前列腺切除术:前100例的病理结果
J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1146-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47661-0.
2
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function.
J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1149-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47662-2.
3
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients.保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术:250例患者术后结果评估
J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):538-43; discussion 544. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40013-9.
4
Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.根治性前列腺切除术中广泛单侧切除神经血管束后的性功能
J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):823-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43385-4.
5
Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.根治性前列腺切除术、性功能保留、癌症控制。争议所在。
Urol Clin North Am. 1987 Nov;14(4):663-73.
6
Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.机器人根治性前列腺切除术后的性功能:基于问卷调查对传统保留神经和保留前列腺筋膜技术术后结果的分析
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181825.54480.eb.
7
Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.保留神经的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能和尿失禁的恢复
J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):905-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35645-8.
8
Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function.保留性功能的根治性膀胱前列腺切除术的神经解剖学方法。
J Urol. 1987 Dec;138(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43655-x.
9
Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view.
J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):145-9.
10
Antegrade approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with difficult apical dissection.困难尖部解剖患者耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的顺行入路
J Urol. 1991 May;145(5):994-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38511-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment and therapeutic advances: a narrative review.与前列腺癌治疗相关的勃起功能障碍及治疗进展:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2625-2643. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-514. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
"Single Knot-Single Running Suture" Vesicourethral Anastomosis with Posterior Musculofascial Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Step-by-Step Guide of Surgical Technique.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中采用“单结-单连续缝合”膀胱尿道吻合术并进行后肌筋膜重建:手术技术分步指南
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 29;13(7):1072. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071072.
3
Long-term comparative outcome analysis of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with retropubic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.
由单一外科医生进行的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的长期比较结果分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01479-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
5
Oncologic outcomes of asian men with clinically localized prostate cancer after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience.亚洲临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者行腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后的肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
Prostate Cancer. 2011;2011:748616. doi: 10.1155/2011/748616. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
6
The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point.开放根治性前列腺切除术切缘学习曲线:切缘状态作为肿瘤学终点的意义。
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
7
Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌后的中期肿瘤学控制比较。
World J Urol. 2009 Oct;27(5):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0379-z. Epub 2009 May 7.
8
Management of the complications of radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术并发症的管理
Curr Urol Rep. 2007 May;8(3):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s11934-007-0006-8.
9
Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The case for open radical prostatectomy.开放性与腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术。开放性根治性前列腺切除术的理由。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Mar;89(2):108-10; discussion 108. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168343.
10
A review of surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术的手术技术综述。
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S11-7.