Nigro Angelo
Department of Rheumatology of Lucania, UOSD of Rheumatology, "Madonna delle Grazie" Hospital, Matera 75100, Basilicata, Italy.
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jun 26;13(18):102194. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i18.102194.
This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in differentiating localized infections from systemic inflammatory diseases like psoriatic arthritis. Nail psoriasis can mimic conditions like paronychia, complicating diagnosis. We wrote this report to emphasize the need for clinical vigilance when interpreting imaging findings, especially in patients with a family history of psoriasis. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary systemic treatments, underscoring the significance of dermatological input in achieving accurate diagnoses.
A 56-year-old woman presented with redness and swelling of multiple fingertips. Her family history of psoriasis raised suspicion of psoriatic arthritis. Two rheumatologists diagnosed psoriatic arthritis based on ultrasound findings of enthesitis with a positive Doppler signal and recommended methotrexate. However, she was reluctant to initiate therapy due to potential side effects. At our Rheumatology Center, paronychia was suspected, and laboratory tests excluded systemic inflammatory arthritis. Dermatological examination confirmed paronychia, and treatment with fluconazole and ceftriaxone was initiated to address suspected mixed bacterial and fungal infections. Imaging studies, including hand and wrist X-rays, showed no erosions or other signs of psoriatic arthritis. The patient responded well to antimicrobial therapy, with resolution of symptoms. This case highlights the need for thorough clinical evaluation, careful interpretation of imaging findings, and collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
This case underscores the need for thorough clinical evaluation and caution in interpreting nonspecific imaging findings, especially in patients with a family history of psoriasis. While familial predisposition may raise suspicion for psoriatic arthritis, it is essential to integrate laboratory data, imaging studies, and clinical presentation, including response to targeted antimicrobial therapy. A multidisciplinary approach, involving both rheumatologists and dermatologists, is crucial to preventing misdiagnosis, ensuring appropriate treatment, and avoiding the potential harms of unwarranted therapies.
本病例凸显了多学科方法在区分局部感染与银屑病关节炎等系统性炎症性疾病方面的重要性。甲银屑病可模仿甲沟炎等病症,使诊断复杂化。我们撰写本报告是为了强调在解读影像学检查结果时保持临床警惕的必要性,尤其是在有银屑病家族史的患者中。误诊可能导致不必要的全身治疗,凸显了皮肤科医生参与以实现准确诊断的重要性。
一名56岁女性出现多个指尖发红肿胀。她的银屑病家族史引发了对银屑病关节炎的怀疑。两名风湿病学家根据超声检查发现附着点炎伴阳性多普勒信号诊断为银屑病关节炎,并建议使用甲氨蝶呤。然而,由于可能的副作用,她不愿开始治疗。在我们的风湿病中心,怀疑为甲沟炎,实验室检查排除了系统性炎症性关节炎。皮肤科检查确诊为甲沟炎,并开始使用氟康唑和头孢曲松治疗,以应对疑似混合细菌和真菌感染。包括手部和腕部X线在内的影像学检查未显示银屑病关节炎的侵蚀或其他迹象。患者对抗菌治疗反应良好,症状得到缓解。本病例凸显了进行全面临床评估、仔细解读影像学检查结果以及风湿病学家和皮肤科医生之间合作以避免误诊和不适当治疗的必要性。
本病例强调了进行全面临床评估以及在解读非特异性影像学检查结果时保持谨慎的必要性,尤其是在有银屑病家族史的患者中。虽然家族易感性可能引发对银屑病关节炎的怀疑,但整合实验室数据、影像学检查和临床表现,包括对靶向抗菌治疗的反应至关重要。涉及风湿病学家和皮肤科医生的多学科方法对于预防误诊、确保适当治疗以及避免不必要治疗的潜在危害至关重要。