Suppr超能文献

不同类型整体多层预染色氧化锆陶瓷的颜色准确性。

Color accuracy of different types of monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia ceramics.

机构信息

Dental Technician, Huayi Dental Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Research Assistant, Department of Anatomy and Functional Restorations, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan; Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):789.e1-789.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The use of monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia facilitates the production of esthetic restorations in a convenient and straightforward manner. However, the accuracy of the final color is not clear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the color accuracy of different types of monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia ceramics of varying thicknesses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty cubical A2-shade monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia ceramic specimens (15×15 mm) of 2 different thicknesses (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm) and 4 zirconia brands (UPCERA EXPLORE [UPEX], KATANA Zirconia STML [STML], Enamel ZR Multi-5 [EZM5], and Aidite 3D Pro Zir [A3DM]) were fabricated and divided into 8 groups (n=10). The Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIELab) values were measured against 3 different backing substrates (gray, transparent, and A2) by using a spectrophotometer. The color difference (ΔE) between the backing substrates of each group and the Vita A2 Shade Guide, translucency parameter (TP), and chroma (C) values were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the final color. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey HSD tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

The ΔE values for UPEX and STML exceeded the clinically acceptable thresholds for gray and transparent backing substrates (ΔE>3.7) and were higher than those for the A2 backing substrate. A3DM showed less ΔE from the shade guide for all the backing substrates (P<.05), and the corresponding ΔE values were within the clinically acceptable threshold (ΔE<3.7). The TP value was inversely proportional, and the C value was proportional to thickness. For the zirconia ceramics with identical thicknesses, UPEX and STML exhibited the highest TP values, and A3DM showed the lowest C value (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

At a specific thickness, color accuracy was mainly affected by the type of monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia ceramic, and the high transparency of ceramics will cause color differences.

摘要

问题陈述

使用整体多层预染色氧化锆可方便快捷地制作出美观的修复体。然而,最终颜色的准确性尚不清楚。

目的

本体外研究的目的是确定不同厚度的不同类型整体多层预染色氧化锆陶瓷的颜色准确性。

材料和方法

制作了 80 个立方 A2 色调整体多层预染色氧化锆陶瓷试件(15×15mm),厚度为 2 种(1.0mm 和 1.5mm),4 种氧化锆品牌(UPCERA EXPLORE[UPEX]、KATANA Zirconia STML[STML]、Enamel ZR Multi-5[EZM5]和 Aidite 3D Pro Zir[A3DM]),并将其分为 8 组(n=10)。使用分光光度计测量每个试件在 3 种不同背衬基底(灰色、透明和 A2)下的 CIELab 值。计算每组试件与 Vita A2 比色板之间的颜色差异(ΔE)、半透明度参数(TP)和彩度(C)值,以评估最终颜色的准确性。采用方差分析和事后 Tukey HSD 检验(α=.05)进行统计分析。

结果

UPEX 和 STML 的ΔE 值超过了灰色和透明背衬基底的临床可接受阈值(ΔE>3.7),且高于 A2 背衬基底。A3DM 对所有背衬基底的比色板显示出较小的ΔE(P<.05),相应的ΔE 值在临床可接受范围内(ΔE<3.7)。TP 值与厚度成反比,C 值与厚度成正比。对于相同厚度的氧化锆陶瓷,UPEX 和 STML 表现出最高的 TP 值,而 A3DM 表现出最低的 C 值(P<.05)。

结论

在特定厚度下,颜色准确性主要受整体多层预染色氧化锆陶瓷类型的影响,陶瓷的高透明度会导致颜色差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验