Rasmussen Janae, Liakos Brendan J, Frasier Kelly M, Paisner Noah, Huish Eric, Lin Shu, Mauger McHenry, Gellman Richard
Orthopedic Surgery, Valley Consortium for Medical Education, Modesto, USA.
Dermatology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, USA.
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84912. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Understanding family planning perceptions among medical residents across different specialties is crucial for addressing the challenges of balancing personal and professional responsibilities. This survey aimed to evaluate how residents in orthopedic surgery (OS), non-orthopedic surgical specialties (SS), and non-surgical specialties (NSS) view the factors that help or hinder family planning and perceptions of their specialty's support for family planning. We hypothesized that NSS residents would view family planning as more manageable compared to those in OS and SS. Objective The goal of this study is to observe factors in orthopedic surgery compared to other surgical and non-surgical specialties that may influence a resident's family planning decisions during training. Methods A self-reported survey was distributed via Instagram and emailed to residents training in the United States of America, and was open to all postgraduate years and specialties. The 28-question survey assessed perceptions of family leave policies, the feasibility of starting a family during training, and factors influencing delays in family planning. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected, and a chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. Results This survey of 202 residents across various specialties revealed that family planning support varies significantly, with surgical specialties perceiving fewer opportunities for having children compared to non-surgical specialties. Female representation amongst faculty positively influenced family planning decisions, with over half of female residents in SS and NSS reporting that it impacted their likelihood of having children during residency, suggesting a positive correlation between female faculty and family planning. Additionally, financial constraints, program culture, and the presence of nearby family were key factors influencing family planning decisions across all groups. Conclusions This study highlights significant disparities in perceived support for family planning across medical specialties, with OS and SS viewed as more challenging. The presence of female faculty positively influences female residents' decisions. These findings call for policies and resources to support residents, particularly in male-dominated fields such as orthopedic surgery.
背景
了解不同专业的住院医师对计划生育的看法对于应对平衡个人和职业责任的挑战至关重要。本调查旨在评估骨科手术(OS)、非骨科手术专业(SS)和非手术专业(NSS)的住院医师如何看待有助于或阻碍计划生育的因素,以及他们对本专业计划生育支持的看法。我们假设,与OS和SS专业的住院医师相比,NSS专业的住院医师会认为计划生育更易于管理。
目的
本研究的目的是观察与其他手术和非手术专业相比,骨科手术中可能影响住院医师培训期间计划生育决策的因素。
方法
通过Instagram分发了一份自我报告调查问卷,并通过电子邮件发送给在美国接受培训的住院医师,所有研究生年级和专业均可参与。这份包含28个问题的调查问卷评估了对产假政策的看法、培训期间生育的可行性以及影响计划生育延迟的因素。收集了定性和定量数据,并使用卡方检验进行统计分析。
结果
这项对202名不同专业住院医师的调查显示,计划生育支持存在显著差异,手术专业的住院医师认为生育机会比非手术专业少。女性教员的比例对计划生育决策有积极影响,SS和NSS专业中超过一半的女性住院医师表示这影响了她们在住院期间生育的可能性,这表明女性教员与计划生育之间存在正相关。此外,经济限制、项目文化和附近有家人是影响所有组计划生育决策的关键因素。
结论
本研究强调了不同医学专业在计划生育支持方面存在的显著差异,OS和SS专业被认为更具挑战性。女性教员的存在对女性住院医师的决策有积极影响。这些发现呼吁制定政策和提供资源来支持住院医师,特别是在骨科手术等男性主导的领域。