Ma Yuqi, Li Jia, Liu Liyun, Shen Tao
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 12;16:1579613. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1579613. eCollection 2025.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of global cancer mortality, often presents at advanced stages with limited efficacy from standard chemotherapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of six oral traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) combined with chemotherapy for NSCLC.
Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, = 2,846 patients) was conducted. Databases including PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Web of Science were searched. Outcomes assessed included objective response rate (ORR), immune markers (CD4-CD8 ratio and natural killer (NK) cells), tumor markers (CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CYFRA21-1), and adverse events. Data were synthesized using STATA 14.0 and R software, with risk of bias evaluated via the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool.
Compared to chemotherapy alone, Tongguanteng (TGT, ) demonstrated superior improvement in the ORR [OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25-2.83]. This effect may be attributable to its vincristine content, which modulates apoptosis through cell-cycle regulation pathways. Huisheng (HS) ranked second in efficacy [OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.61], with its emodin component suppressing NSCLC proliferation via NF-κB pathway inhibition. HS was also associated with improvements in immune markers, including CD4+/CD8+ ratio and NK cell activity. Conversely, TGT significantly reduced tumor markers: CA125, CEA, and cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA21-1). This latter observation may be explained by tenacissoside's inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP2D6/CYP3A4), which alter drug metabolism. Although TCM-chemotherapy combinations exhibited improved safety profiles compared to chemotherapy alone, the analysis revealed potential publication bias and moderate heterogeneity.
HS and TGT, potentially through their bioactive components, may enhance chemotherapy efficacy in NSCLC by targeting immune and metabolic pathways. However, these conclusions need further verification. Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to potential bias, limited RCT numbers, and the geographical concentration of studies. Future research should isolate compound-specific effects and validate mechanisms in global trials.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是全球癌症死亡的主要原因之一,通常在晚期出现,标准化疗的疗效有限。本研究评估了六种口服中药联合化疗治疗NSCLC的疗效和安全性。
按照PRISMA-NMA指南,对36项随机对照试验(RCT,n = 2846例患者)进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析。检索了包括PubMed、中国知网(CNKI)和科学网在内的数据库。评估的结局指标包括客观缓解率(ORR)、免疫标志物(CD4-CD8比值和自然杀伤(NK)细胞)、肿瘤标志物(CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1))以及不良事件。使用STATA 14.0和R软件对数据进行合成,通过Cochrane RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。
与单纯化疗相比,通关藤(TGT)在ORR方面显示出更优的改善[OR = 1.88,95%CI:1.25-2.83]。这种效果可能归因于其长春新碱含量,它通过细胞周期调控途径调节细胞凋亡。回生(HS)在疗效方面排名第二[OR = 1.34,95%CI:1.10-1.61],其大黄素成分通过抑制NF-κB途径抑制NSCLC增殖。HS还与免疫标志物的改善有关,包括CD4+/CD8+比值和NK细胞活性。相反,TGT显著降低了肿瘤标志物:CA125、CEA和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)。后一观察结果可能是由于通关藤苷对细胞色素P450酶(CYP2D6/CYP3A4)的抑制作用,从而改变了药物代谢。尽管中药-化疗联合方案与单纯化疗相比显示出更好的安全性,但分析显示存在潜在的发表偏倚和中度异质性。
HS和TGT可能通过其生物活性成分,通过靶向免疫和代谢途径增强NSCLC化疗疗效。然而,这些结论需要进一步验证。由于潜在偏倚、RCT数量有限以及研究的地域集中性,应谨慎解释研究结果。未来的研究应分离化合物特异性效应并在全球试验中验证机制。