Cargou Marine, Lion Julien, Dalhoumi Intissar, Wojciechowski Elodie, Ralazamahaleo Mamy, Guidicelli Gwendaline, Guillaume Nicolas, Visentin Jonathan
CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire D'immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
CHU Amiens-Picardie Site SUD, Centre de Biologie Humaine, Service Histocompatibilité, Amiens, France.
HLA. 2025 Jul;106(1):e70301. doi: 10.1111/tan.70301.
In organ transplantation, immunological risk assessment uses cell crossmatch (XM) results, which can be altered by several drugs. We observed two recipients awaiting kidney and liver transplantation with positive flow cytometry XM (FCXM) on T-cells in the absence of Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA). Both were treated with vedolizumab (VDZ) for an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). VDZ is an IgG1 directed against integrin α4β7, expressed on T and B cell subsets, we therefore suspected that VDZ interfered with XM. We tested with Luminex screening and single antigen assays and with auto- and allo-FCXM on different HLA-typed cells several sera from the two recipients, collected before and during treatment with VDZ. To assess the intensity and the kinetics of the interference, the sera collected during VDZ treatment were from the induction and the maintenance phases at different times post-injection. All sera were DSA-negative with Luminex assays, indicating the absence of interference of VDZ with virtual XM. IgG allo-FCXM on T cells was positive during the maintenance phase while it was randomly positive on B cells. On T cells, the ratio was between 1.6 and 4.4 times the negative control (positivity threshold of 1.5) for the two recipients, and did not depend on the time between collection and injection. Unique T cell populations express Integrin α4β7, then we did not observe a global shift for T cells in the presence of VDZ but a shift for a small subset which was sufficient to induce a positive FCXM. VDZ treatment did not interfere with complement-dependent cytotoxicity XM or with IgM FCXM. Pronase treatment abrogated VDZ interference. In the event of unexpected positive FCXM on T cells in a recipient with IBD, the transplant team should seek VDZ treatment and interference.
在器官移植中,免疫风险评估使用细胞交叉配型(XM)结果,而该结果可能会受到多种药物的影响。我们观察到两名等待肾和肝移植的受者,在没有供者特异性抗体(DSA)的情况下,其T细胞的流式细胞术XM(FCXM)结果呈阳性。两人均因炎症性肠病(IBD)接受了维多珠单抗(VDZ)治疗。VDZ是一种针对整合素α4β7的IgG1,在T和B细胞亚群上表达,因此我们怀疑VDZ干扰了XM。我们使用Luminex筛选和单抗原检测以及在不同HLA分型的细胞上进行自身和同种异体FCXM,检测了两名受者在VDZ治疗前和治疗期间采集的几份血清。为了评估干扰的强度和动力学,在VDZ治疗期间采集的血清来自注射后不同时间的诱导期和维持期。所有血清在Luminex检测中均为DSA阴性,表明VDZ对虚拟XM没有干扰。在维持期,T细胞上的IgG同种异体FCXM呈阳性,而在B细胞上则随机呈阳性。在T细胞上,两名受者的比值是阴性对照的1.6至4.4倍(阳性阈值为1.5),且不取决于采集和注射之间的时间。独特的T细胞群体表达整合素α4β7,因此我们没有观察到在VDZ存在的情况下T细胞的整体变化,而是一小部分细胞亚群发生了变化,这足以诱导FCXM呈阳性。VDZ治疗不干扰补体依赖性细胞毒性XM或IgM FCXM。链霉蛋白酶处理消除了VDZ的干扰。如果IBD受者的T细胞FCXM意外呈阳性,移植团队应排查VDZ治疗及干扰情况。