Yavuz Yunus E, Tatar Sefa, Şahin Ahmet T, Aslan Muzaffer
Department of Cardiology, Siirt Training and Research Hospital, Siirt, Türkiye -
Department of Cardiology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye.
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.25.06817-6.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a significant public health concern with high morbidity. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) in HFpEF, aiming to enhance understanding of its inflammatory and nutritional aspects and identify markers for better diagnosis and risk stratification.
This retrospective cohort study included 71 patients diagnosed with HFpEF using the HFA-PEFF algorithm and 81 control subjects without heart failure. The PIV, and PNI indices were calculated. A 6-month follow-up of the HFpEF group was conducted to assess rehospitalization rates.
The study found that patients with HFpEF had significantly higher PIV and PNI rates than the control group (P=0.016, P<0.001). A negative correlation (r=-0.328, P<0.001) was observed between the PNI and HFA-PEFF scores. The ROC analysis demonstrated that PIV (AUC: 0.92) had the strongest predictive ability for rehospitalization, followed by Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII, AUC: 0.87) and PNI (AUC: 0.78), while BMI showed the weakest performance (AUC: 0.59). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that both PNI (OR: 0.783, 95% CI: 0.627-0.977, P=0.031) and PIV (OR: 1.012, 95% CI: 1.003-1.021, P=0.008) were significant predictors of rehospitalization in HFpEF patients.
PIV and PNI are important parameters that play a predictive role in diagnosing HFpEF and independently predicting rehospitalization. In the multivariate analyses for rehospitalization, that PIV stands out more than SII, and PNI stands out more than BMI, was current and valuable information.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,发病率很高。本研究评估了预后营养指数(PNI)和全免疫炎症值(PIV)在HFpEF中的预后意义,旨在加深对其炎症和营养方面的理解,并确定用于更好诊断和风险分层的标志物。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了71例使用HFA-PEFF算法诊断为HFpEF的患者和81例无心力衰竭的对照受试者。计算了PIV和PNI指数。对HFpEF组进行了为期6个月的随访,以评估再住院率。
研究发现,HFpEF患者的PIV和PNI率显著高于对照组(P=0.016,P<0.001)。PNI与HFA-PEFF评分之间存在负相关(r=-0.328,P<0.001)。ROC分析表明,PIV(AUC:0.92)对再住院的预测能力最强,其次是全身免疫炎症指数(SII,AUC:0.87)和PNI(AUC:0.78),而BMI的表现最弱(AUC:0.59)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,PNI(OR:0.783,95%CI:0.627-0.977,P=0.031)和PIV(OR:1.012,95%CI:1.003-1.021,P=0.008)均为HFpEF患者再住院的显著预测因素。
PIV和PNI是重要参数,在诊断HFpEF和独立预测再住院方面发挥着预测作用。在再住院的多因素分析中,PIV比SII更突出,PNI比BMI更突出,这是当前有价值的信息。