Rauhe Katharina Anna, Kasprzak Annika, Schulz Felicitas, Nachtkamp Kathrin, Strupp Corinna, Kündgen Andrea, Dietrich Sascha, Mayer Karin, Götze Katharina S, Hofmann Wolf-Karsten, Giagounidis Aristoteles, Gattermann Norbert, Germing Ulrich
Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Bielefeld-Mitte, Medical School and University Medical Center Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ann Hematol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06485-w.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Due to age, comorbidities, or lack of urgency, many receive only palliative therapies to improve quality of life. Some patients remain untreated due to a lack of symptoms or low progression risk. Data on the impact of palliative therapies on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) are limited. Using the Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we compared outcomes of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) alone to the outcome of patients receiving RBCT combined with iron chelation therapy (ICT), erythropoietin (EPO), antithymoglobulin (ATG), or lenalidomide (LENA). Matched-pairs analysis was conducted using age, gender, and prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-specific Prognostic Scoring System). ICT-treated patients (n = 85) had significantly improved OS (70 vs. 21 months, p < 0.001) and lower 5-year AML progression (3.5% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001). Similar benefits were seen with EPO (n = 210; OS: 63 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001; AML: 5.7% vs. 19%, p = 0.007) and LENA (n = 30; OS: 92 vs. 57 months, p = 0.049; AML: 0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.024). ATG (n = 11) showed no significant improvement in OS (79 vs. 64 months) or AML progression (0% vs. 18.2%). While recognizing the limitations of matched-pairs analysis versus randomized trials, our findings indicate a survival benefit from ICT, EPO, or LENA versus RBCT alone. The year of diagnosis did not independently affect OS or LFS. These results support the use of selected palliative therapies to improve long-term outcomes in MDS patients. KEY POINTS: Treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with non-curative therapies beyond red blood cell transfusions like iron chelation therapy, erythropoietin, or lenalidomide has a positive impact on overall survival and leukemia-free survival.
异基因干细胞移植(SCT)仍然是高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者唯一的治愈性疗法。由于年龄、合并症或缺乏紧迫性,许多患者仅接受姑息性治疗以提高生活质量。一些患者因无症状或进展风险低而未接受治疗。关于姑息性治疗对总生存期(OS)和无白血病生存期(LFS)影响的数据有限。利用杜塞尔多夫MDS登记处的数据,我们比较了仅接受红细胞输注(RBCT)的患者与接受RBCT联合铁螯合疗法(ICT)、促红细胞生成素(EPO)、抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)或来那度胺(LENA)的患者的结局。使用年龄、性别和预后评分(修订的国际预后评分系统或慢性粒单核细胞白血病特异性预后评分系统)进行配对分析。接受ICT治疗的患者(n = 85)的总生存期显著改善(70个月对21个月,p < 0.001),5年急性髓系白血病(AML)进展率更低(3.5%对28.2%,p < 0.001)。EPO(n = 210;总生存期:63个月对24个月,p < 0.001;AML:5.7%对19%,p = 0.007)和LENA(n = 30;总生存期:92个月对57个月,p = 0.049;AML:0%对16.7%,p = 0.024)也有类似益处。ATG(n = 11)在总生存期(79个月对64个月)或AML进展(0%对18.2%)方面未显示出显著改善。虽然认识到配对分析相对于随机试验的局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,与单纯RBCT相比,ICT、EPO或LENA可带来生存益处。诊断年份并未独立影响总生存期或无白血病生存期。这些结果支持使用选定的姑息性疗法来改善MDS患者的长期结局。要点:用铁螯合疗法、促红细胞生成素或来那度胺等红细胞输注以外的非治愈性疗法治疗骨髓增生异常综合征患者对总生存期和无白血病生存期有积极影响。