Kubota Naoko, Matsuura Noriko, Ebina Maiko, Suzuki Hitomi, Miyagi Nagomi, Masukawa Naoki, Kouga Fumihiro, Yamanaka Yujiro
Laboratory of Life & Health Sciences, Faculty of Education & Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, North 11, West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-0811, Japan.
Department of Nursing, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, Japan.
Biogerontology. 2025 Jun 27;26(4):131. doi: 10.1007/s10522-025-10280-5.
In the present study, we investigated 70 elderly individuals with dementia residing in a group home in Japan (88.1 ± 6.6 SD years; 12 males and 58 females). Sleep measurements were collected via an accelerometer placed under the mattress from March 2021 to January 2024. The accelerometer-derived activity counts were transformed and plotted as actograms. On the basis of the actograms, sleep patterns were categorized into three groups: regular nighttime sleep (Type 1, n = 38, 54.3%), regular nighttime sleep with daytime naps (Type 2, n = 29, 41.4%), and irregular sleep (Type 3, n = 3, 4.3%). We compared accelerometer-derived sleep measures between the Type 1 and Type 2 groups due to the small number of participants in Type 3. Interestingly, Type 2 individuals had a significantly longer bed in time and total sleep time. However, their sleep onset latency, time of wakefulness after sleep onset and sleep efficiency did not differ from those of Type 1 individuals. Additionally, we assessed the relationships between sleep patterns and dementia characteristics, such as independence in daily living and level of care needed. No significant differences were observed in sleep measurements across these characteristics. To evaluate endogenous circadian rhythms, seven dementia patients (Type 1, n = 1; Type 2, n = 6) wore a patch-type wearable temperature sensor for approximately 24 h to estimate core body temperature (CBT). Although the zero-amplitude test revealed a significant rhythmicity in all patients, the CBT rhythms showed lower amplitude and unstable phases. In summary, our findings indicate that dementia patients display varying sleep patterns that are independent of dementia characteristics. The dysfunction of sleep homeostasis and entrainment of circadian pacemakers might be due to the light environment in the group home residence or impairment of the circadian clock itself in dementia patients.
在本研究中,我们调查了居住在日本一家集体之家的70名老年痴呆症患者(平均年龄88.1±6.6标准差岁;男性12名,女性58名)。从2021年3月至2024年1月,通过放置在床垫下的加速度计收集睡眠测量数据。将加速度计得出的活动计数进行转换并绘制为活动图。根据活动图,睡眠模式分为三组:规律夜间睡眠(1型,n = 38,54.3%)、规律夜间睡眠伴有白天小睡(2型,n = 29,41.4%)和不规律睡眠(3型,n = 3,4.3%)。由于3型参与者数量较少,我们比较了1型和2型组之间加速度计得出的睡眠指标。有趣的是,2型个体在床上的时间和总睡眠时间明显更长。然而,他们的入睡潜伏期、睡眠开始后的清醒时间和睡眠效率与1型个体没有差异。此外,我们评估了睡眠模式与痴呆症特征之间的关系,如日常生活独立性和所需护理水平。在这些特征的睡眠测量中未观察到显著差异。为了评估内源性昼夜节律,7名痴呆症患者(1型,n = 1;2型,n = 6)佩戴了贴片式可穿戴温度传感器约24小时以估计核心体温(CBT)。尽管零振幅测试显示所有患者都有显著的节律性,但CBT节律的振幅较低且相位不稳定。总之,我们的研究结果表明,痴呆症患者表现出不同的睡眠模式,这些模式与痴呆症特征无关。睡眠稳态功能障碍和昼夜节律起搏器的失调可能是由于集体之家的光照环境或痴呆症患者自身昼夜节律时钟的损害。