Bangiri Anna, Horobin Adele, Baker Julia, Pszczolkowski Stefan, Thust Stefanie, Morgan Paul S
Radiotherapy North, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - City Campus, Nottingham, UK
Radiological and Imaging Sciences, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 26;15(6):e094788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094788.
Patient and public involvement (PPI) was sought in the development of the protocol for the Cognitive Decline after Brain Radiosurgery (CoDe B-Rad) study, which aims to identify potential side effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). PPI served to refine the research question and methodology.
PPI.
PPI conducted online with people based in the UK. The CoDe B-Rad study is running in regional National Health Service tertiary care in the UK and is currently nearing recruitment completion.
Patients and carers with lived experiences of brain radiotherapy. Contributors were identified through national charities.
Initial focus groups were planned, but participation proved challenging. Instead, online questionnaires, one-to-one discussions and participation in support groups were completed.
All contributors experienced changes to their cognition and/or quality of life (QoL) after radiotherapy. Quantifying the side effects of SRS and minimising them were identified as a research gap. Discussion group participation proved challenging. PPI plans were altered to accommodate the physical and mental needs of contributors. It was decided to combine the Montreal Cognitive Assessment along with European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer QLQ-C30 and BN20 to capture cognitive status and QoL of patients with brain metastases and meningiomas after SRS. Patients/carers recommended for sessions to be restricted to 30 min and testing to be offered face-to-face, online, in hospital or at patients' homes. Coproduction was not achievable with our patient population but that did not diminish the input of contributors nor the impact it had on designing the study protocol.
In cancer research, diligent considerations are required to ensure the suitability of involvement methods for this vulnerable population. Flexibility and adaptability of draft PPI plans are essential to achieve meaningful contributions. The protocol of the ongoing CoDe B-Rad study was positively shaped by people with lived experiences of brain radiotherapy.
NCT06466720 (CoDe B-Rad study).
在制定脑立体定向放射治疗后认知功能衰退(CoDe B-Rad)研究方案的过程中寻求患者及公众参与(PPI),该研究旨在确定立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)的潜在副作用。PPI有助于完善研究问题和方法。
PPI。
在英国通过线上方式对人群开展PPI。CoDe B-Rad研究正在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的地区三级医疗机构中进行,目前已接近招募尾声。
有脑放疗亲身经历的患者及照料者。通过全国性慈善机构确定参与者。
原计划开展初始焦点小组讨论,但事实证明参与存在困难。取而代之的是完成了在线问卷、一对一讨论以及参与支持小组。
所有参与者在放疗后认知和/或生活质量(QoL)都发生了变化。确定SRS副作用的量化以及将其最小化是一个研究空白。事实证明参与讨论组存在困难。调整了PPI计划以满足参与者的身心需求。决定将蒙特利尔认知评估与欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的QLQ-C30和BN20相结合,以获取SRS后脑转移瘤和脑膜瘤患者的认知状态和生活质量。患者/照料者建议将问诊时间限制在30分钟,并提供面对面、在线、在医院或患者家中的检测。我们的患者群体无法实现共同生产,但这并未减少参与者的投入及其对研究方案设计的影响。
在癌症研究中,需要认真考虑以确保参与方法适合这一弱势群体。PPI计划草案的灵活性和适应性对于获得有意义的贡献至关重要。正在进行的CoDe B-Rad研究方案受到有脑放疗亲身经历者的积极影响。
NCT06466720(CoDe B-Rad研究)