Al-Azizi Karim, Thomas Sibi, Hajar Mohamad Bader Abo, Pickering Taylor, McCullough Kyle, Dorton Cody, Moubarak Ghadi, Ma Tsung-Wei, Banwait Jasjit, Hale Sarah, Gupta Swapnil, DiMaio J Michael, Szerlip Molly, Matar Ralph, Aqtash Obadah, Baig Imran, Trehan Sanjeev, Potluri Srini
Department of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, TX, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, TX, USA.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.05.029.
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation deemed high risk for bleeding. LAAO is performed via a transseptal approach with the placement of an occlusion device in the left atrial appendage (LAA) to seal it. Intraoperative imaging with echocardiography is needed to guide and complete the procedure. Historically, Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the most frequently used modality for intraprocedural guidance. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as an adjunct to, or even an alternative to, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), with several unique advantages and potential challenges. Several publications have highlighted the safety and feasibility of ICE in LAAO (Hemam et al., 2019; Morcos et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023 [2, 5, 7]). The most recent SCAI/HRS consensus statement recommends using TEE or ICE in procedural guidance (Saw et al., 2023 [8]). To date, no prospective randomized controlled trials have addressed the safety and feasibility of ICE-guided LAAO, compared to TEE guidance. The ICE TEE trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical trial that will assess the efficacy and safety of ICE-guided LAAO compared to traditional TEE-guided LAAO. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint of the study is the procedural success of LAAO device implantation, defined as the appropriate device implantation as per the IFU, without device-related complications, and no peri-device leaks >5 mm on color Doppler, according to the Munich consensus. Secondary endpoints include periprocedural complications, procedural characteristics, and cost of hospitalization. Patients will be assessed at 45 days with a TEE to evaluate for any peri-device leak (PDL). The trial aims to assess the efficacy and potential complications of using ICE to guide the implantation of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices compared to the traditional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)- guided LAAO.
左心耳封堵术(LAAO)已成为非瓣膜性心房颤动患者预防卒中的一种替代长期抗凝治疗的方法,这些患者被认为出血风险高。LAAO通过经房间隔途径进行,在左心耳(LAA)中放置封堵装置以封闭它。术中需要超声心动图成像来指导和完成该手术。历史上,经食管超声心动图(TEE)一直是术中指导最常用的方式。最近,心腔内超声心动图(ICE)作为经食管超声心动图(TEE)的辅助手段甚至替代方法的应用越来越受到关注,它具有几个独特的优点和潜在挑战。一些出版物强调了ICE在LAAO中的安全性和可行性(Hemam等人,2019年;Morcos等人,2022年;Zhang等人,2023年[2,5,7])。最新的SCAI/HRS共识声明建议在手术指导中使用TEE或ICE(Saw等人,2023年[8])。迄今为止,尚无前瞻性随机对照试验探讨与TEE指导相比,ICE指导LAAO的安全性和可行性。ICE-TEE试验是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机、平行对照、开放标签的临床试验,将评估与传统TEE指导的LAAO相比,ICE指导的LAAO的疗效和安全性。患者以1:1的方式随机分组。该研究的主要终点是LAAO装置植入的手术成功率,根据慕尼黑共识,定义为按照IFU进行适当的装置植入,无装置相关并发症,且彩色多普勒显示装置周围无>5mm的渗漏。次要终点包括围手术期并发症、手术特征和住院费用。将在45天时用TEE对患者进行评估,以评估是否存在任何装置周围渗漏(PDL)。该试验旨在评估与传统经食管超声心动图(TEE)指导的LAAO相比,使用ICE指导经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAO)装置植入的疗效和潜在并发症。