Liu Jingyuan, Lyu Chunwei, Kwan Crystal, Lan Xi, Deng Jie, Zhang Jinxuan
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02945-w.
Given the rapid development of psychosocial interventions for older adults in China and the significant mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to evaluate psychosocial interventions' effectiveness in promoting mental health of China's older population. To address this need, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.
We conducted a comprehensive search across nine electronic databases and Google Scholar for controlled trial studies published between 2018 and 2023. A meta-analytic approach with random-effects models was employed, and moderator analyses explored variability in effect size estimates.
Thirty-one studies with 5,941 participants were included. Guided by the WHO's framework, mental health indicators were categorized as positive or negative. Positive indicators reflect better mental health with higher values, while negative indicators show worse mental health. Significant effects were noted for negative (g = -1.21, 95% CI: -1.44, 0.99) and positive (g = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.84) mental health indicators, moderating by geographic region, intervention type, setting, and delivery modality.
Psychosocial services could significantly benefit Chinese older adults' mental health. The moderator and subgroup analysis suggests that the most effective interventions involve mental health professionals and utilize multifaceted approaches. Additionally, the results indicate that intervention duration is an important consideration, as shorter-term programs in Hong Kong exhibited relatively smaller effects.
鉴于中国针对老年人的社会心理干预措施迅速发展,以及新冠疫情对心理健康产生的重大影响,评估社会心理干预措施对促进中国老年人群心理健康的有效性至关重要。为满足这一需求,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
我们对九个电子数据库和谷歌学术进行了全面检索,以查找2018年至2023年发表的对照试验研究。采用随机效应模型的荟萃分析方法,并进行调节因素分析以探索效应量估计值的变异性。
纳入了31项研究,共5941名参与者。以世界卫生组织的框架为指导,心理健康指标分为正向或负向。正向指标反映心理健康状况较好且数值较高,而负向指标则显示心理健康状况较差。负向(g = -1.21,95%置信区间:-1.44,-0.99)和正向(g = 0.68,95%置信区间:0.51,0.84)心理健康指标均存在显著效应,调节因素包括地理区域、干预类型、环境和实施方式。
社会心理服务可显著有益于中国老年人的心理健康。调节因素和亚组分析表明,最有效的干预措施涉及心理健康专业人员并采用多方面方法。此外,结果表明干预持续时间是一个重要考虑因素,因为香港的短期项目效果相对较小。