• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球健康的“苏格兰方法”:对全球健康伙伴关系框架的范围界定审查

The 'Scottish approach' to global health: A scoping review of the framing of global health partnerships.

作者信息

Kim Kristina, Qureshi Kaveri, Adrion Emily, Zangana Goran, Abeysinghe Sudeepa

机构信息

Global Health Policy Unit, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Acute & General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524069. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069. Epub 2025 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069
PMID:40580419
Abstract

The narrative framings of partnerships and interventions in global health shed light on actors' conceptualisations of international development. Ideas of equity and justice in North-South partnerships are increasingly centred in international development and global health policy approaches. However, the extent to which these are evident within practice requires further investigation. This paper critically examines published work from health actors based in Scotland conducted within low - and middle-income countries (LMICs), under a Scottish government policy context currently promoted as engaging in a novel approach to international development. The paper uses a scoping review to analyse Scottish actors' engagement and framing of global health interventions and partnerships with LMIC actors. A majority of the texts discussed Scottish-affiliated global health partnerships and/or interventions in the Malawian medical education and clinical medicine context and focused on capacity building and knowledge transfer. Authors of included documents characterised the 'Scottish approach' to partnership as rejecting the traditional donor-aid model and championing ideas of collaboration, reciprocity and equity in partnership. Yet simultaneously, most works described partnerships that positioned Scottish actors as the sources of expertise with partner country actors as beneficiaries, replicating the donor-recipient aid model. Additionally, the framing of partnership activities frequently deployed historical narrative frames.

摘要

全球卫生领域伙伴关系与干预措施的叙事框架揭示了行为体对国际发展的概念化理解。南北伙伴关系中的公平与正义理念在国际发展和全球卫生政策方法中日益占据核心地位。然而,这些理念在实践中的体现程度仍需进一步调查。本文批判性地审视了苏格兰卫生行为体在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展的、在苏格兰政府目前倡导的一种新型国际发展政策背景下发表的研究成果。本文采用范围综述法,分析苏格兰行为体对全球卫生干预措施的参与情况以及与LMIC行为体的伙伴关系框架。大多数文本讨论了与苏格兰相关的全球卫生伙伴关系和/或在马拉维医学教育和临床医学背景下的干预措施,重点是能力建设和知识转移。纳入文献的作者将伙伴关系的“苏格兰方式”描述为摒弃传统的捐助援助模式,倡导伙伴关系中的合作、互惠和公平理念。然而,与此同时,大多数作品描述的伙伴关系将苏格兰行为体定位为专业知识来源,而伙伴国家行为体为受益者,这复制了捐助方-受援方援助模式。此外,伙伴关系活动的框架经常采用历史叙事框架。

相似文献

1
The 'Scottish approach' to global health: A scoping review of the framing of global health partnerships.全球健康的“苏格兰方法”:对全球健康伙伴关系框架的范围界定审查
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524069. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
4
Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature.低收入和中等收入国家的卫生研究能力发展:现实还是空谈?对定性文献的系统元叙事综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e012332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012332.
5
Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low and middle income countries: A realist review.低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域的权力动态与部门间合作:一项现实主义综述
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf022.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
9
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.