Kim Kristina, Qureshi Kaveri, Adrion Emily, Zangana Goran, Abeysinghe Sudeepa
Global Health Policy Unit, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Acute & General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524069. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
The narrative framings of partnerships and interventions in global health shed light on actors' conceptualisations of international development. Ideas of equity and justice in North-South partnerships are increasingly centred in international development and global health policy approaches. However, the extent to which these are evident within practice requires further investigation. This paper critically examines published work from health actors based in Scotland conducted within low - and middle-income countries (LMICs), under a Scottish government policy context currently promoted as engaging in a novel approach to international development. The paper uses a scoping review to analyse Scottish actors' engagement and framing of global health interventions and partnerships with LMIC actors. A majority of the texts discussed Scottish-affiliated global health partnerships and/or interventions in the Malawian medical education and clinical medicine context and focused on capacity building and knowledge transfer. Authors of included documents characterised the 'Scottish approach' to partnership as rejecting the traditional donor-aid model and championing ideas of collaboration, reciprocity and equity in partnership. Yet simultaneously, most works described partnerships that positioned Scottish actors as the sources of expertise with partner country actors as beneficiaries, replicating the donor-recipient aid model. Additionally, the framing of partnership activities frequently deployed historical narrative frames.
全球卫生领域伙伴关系与干预措施的叙事框架揭示了行为体对国际发展的概念化理解。南北伙伴关系中的公平与正义理念在国际发展和全球卫生政策方法中日益占据核心地位。然而,这些理念在实践中的体现程度仍需进一步调查。本文批判性地审视了苏格兰卫生行为体在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展的、在苏格兰政府目前倡导的一种新型国际发展政策背景下发表的研究成果。本文采用范围综述法,分析苏格兰行为体对全球卫生干预措施的参与情况以及与LMIC行为体的伙伴关系框架。大多数文本讨论了与苏格兰相关的全球卫生伙伴关系和/或在马拉维医学教育和临床医学背景下的干预措施,重点是能力建设和知识转移。纳入文献的作者将伙伴关系的“苏格兰方式”描述为摒弃传统的捐助援助模式,倡导伙伴关系中的合作、互惠和公平理念。然而,与此同时,大多数作品描述的伙伴关系将苏格兰行为体定位为专业知识来源,而伙伴国家行为体为受益者,这复制了捐助方-受援方援助模式。此外,伙伴关系活动的框架经常采用历史叙事框架。