Roy Charlotte M, Garbern Stephanie C, Relan Pryanka, Bills Corey B, Schultz Megan L, Wang Alex H, Severson Hayley E, Hexom Braden J, Kivlehan Sean M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUSA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode IslandUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2025 Jun;40(3):169-181. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X25101222. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
Blast injuries can occur by a multitude of mechanisms, including improvised explosive devices (IEDs), military munitions, and accidental detonation of chemical or petroleum stores. These injuries disproportionately affect people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where there are often fewer resources to manage complex injuries and mass-casualty events.
The aim of this systematic review is to describe the literature on the acute facility-based management of blast injuries in LMICs to aid hospitals and organizations preparing to respond to conflict- and non-conflict-related blast events.
A search of Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases was used to identify relevant citations from January 1998 through July 2024. This systematic review was conducted in adherence with PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted and analyzed descriptively. A meta-analysis calculated the pooled proportions of mortality, hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation and mechanical ventilation, and emergency surgery.
Reviewers screened 3,731 titles and abstracts and 173 full texts. Seventy-five articles from 22 countries were included for analysis. Only 14.7% of included articles came from low-income countries (LICs). Sixty percent of studies were conducted in tertiary care hospitals. The mean proportion of patients who were admitted was 52.1% (95% CI, 0.376 to 0.664). Among all in-patients, 20.0% (95% CI, 0.124 to 0.288) were admitted to an ICU. Overall, 38.0% (95% CI, 0.256 to 0.513) of in-patients underwent emergency surgery and 13.8% (95% CI, 0.023 to 0.315) were intubated. Pooled in-patient mortality was 9.5% (95% CI, 0.046 to 0.156) and total hospital mortality (including emergency department [ED] mortality) was 7.4% (95% CI, 0.034 to 0.124). There were no significant differences in mortality when stratified by country income level or hospital setting.
Findings from this systematic review can be used to guide preparedness and resource allocation for acute care facilities. Pooled proportions for mortality and other outcomes described in the meta-analysis offer a metric by which future researchers can assess the impact of blast events. Under-representation of LICs and non-tertiary care medical facilities and significant heterogeneity in data reporting among published studies limited the analysis.
爆炸伤可通过多种机制发生,包括简易爆炸装置、军事弹药以及化学或石油储存的意外爆炸。这些伤害对低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的人群影响尤为严重,因为在这些国家,处理复杂伤害和大规模伤亡事件的资源往往较少。
本系统评价的目的是描述关于LMICs中基于医疗机构的爆炸伤急性管理的文献,以帮助医院和组织为应对与冲突和非冲突相关的爆炸事件做好准备。
检索Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus、全球医学索引、科学网、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库,以识别1998年1月至2024年7月的相关引文。本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。数据进行描述性提取和分析。荟萃分析计算了死亡率、住院率、重症监护病房(ICU)入住率、插管和机械通气率以及急诊手术率的合并比例。
reviewers筛选了3731篇标题和摘要以及173篇全文。纳入分析的有来自22个国家的75篇文章。纳入文章中只有14.7%来自低收入国家(LICs)。60%的研究在三级护理医院进行。入院患者的平均比例为52.1%(95%CI,0.376至0.664)。在所有住院患者中,20.0%(95%CI,0.124至0.288)入住ICU。总体而言,38.0%(95%CI,0.256至0.513)的住院患者接受了急诊手术,13.8%(95%CI,0.023至0.315)进行了插管。住院患者合并死亡率为9.5%(95%CI,0.046至0.156),医院总死亡率(包括急诊科[ED]死亡率)为7.4%(95%CI,0.034至0.124)。按国家收入水平或医院环境分层时,死亡率无显著差异。
本系统评价的结果可用于指导急性护理机构的准备工作和资源分配。荟萃分析中描述的死亡率和其他结果的合并比例提供了一个指标,未来的研究人员可以据此评估爆炸事件的影响。LICs和非三级护理医疗机构的代表性不足以及已发表研究中数据报告的显著异质性限制了分析。