• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介绍CRIS——一个跨学科系统文献检索的统一框架。

Introducing CRIS-A unified framework for systematic literature searches across disciplines.

作者信息

Ciemer Celina, Klotzbier Thomas Jürgen, Ghellal Sabiha, Schott Nadja

机构信息

Institute for Sport and Movement Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Institute for Games, Stuttgart Media University, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1489161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1489161. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1489161
PMID:40584544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202348/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cross-disciplinary research approaches have become more necessary in light of the increasing global and societal challenges. As different forms of collaboration emerge, cross-disciplinary systematic reviews that integrate these approaches are increasingly recognized as crucial. A key part of these reviews is conducting a valid and thorough literature search. To comprehend the state of knowledge, integrating diverse findings and ensuring that the literature search captures relevant studies from all viewpoints, including their combinations and collaborations, is important.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents a framework for conducting cross-disciplinary literature searches that adhere to established best-practice guidelines and reporting standards. The framework seeks to include research across all forms of collaboration across disciplines, including multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary. The objective is to enhance the sensitivity and robustness of literature searches in cross-disciplinary research contexts.

METHODS

We developed a framework that integrates a pre-process into the search to support cross-disciplinary literature searches. Additionally, we derived a procedure from specific concepts, including the use of shared thesaurus, focus, and iterative approach, which are applied throughout the various stages of the process. To demonstrate the value of the cross-disciplinary literature search (CRIS) framework, we performed an example search that combines User Experience and Game Design with Human Movement Science. We conducted three literature searches and compared our framework with discipline-specific and an expert overlap perspectives.

RESULTS

By applying our CRIS framework, we observed significant improvements in sensitivity and robustness compared to the other searches, illustrating the framework's effectiveness in cross-disciplinary research settings.

CONCLUSION

Through our example, which combines User Experience and Game Design with Human Movement Science, we show that our framework substantially enhances the quality of literature searches, underscoring its potential for advancing cross-disciplinary research.

摘要

引言

鉴于全球和社会挑战日益增多,跨学科研究方法变得愈发必要。随着不同形式的合作不断涌现,整合这些方法的跨学科系统评价日益被视为至关重要。这些评价的一个关键部分是进行有效且全面的文献检索。为了理解知识状态,整合多样的研究结果并确保文献检索涵盖所有观点的相关研究,包括它们的组合与合作,这一点很重要。

目的

本文提出了一个进行跨学科文献检索的框架,该框架遵循既定的最佳实践指南和报告标准。该框架旨在纳入跨学科所有形式合作的研究,包括多学科、跨学科和超学科。目的是提高跨学科研究背景下文献检索的敏感性和稳健性。

方法

我们开发了一个将预处理整合到检索中的框架,以支持跨学科文献检索。此外,我们从特定概念中推导了一个程序,包括使用共享词库、重点和迭代方法,这些方法在过程的各个阶段都有应用。为了证明跨学科文献检索(CRIS)框架的价值,我们进行了一个将用户体验和游戏设计与人体运动科学相结合的示例检索。我们进行了三次文献检索,并将我们的框架与特定学科和专家重叠视角进行了比较。

结果

通过应用我们的CRIS框架,我们观察到与其他检索相比,在敏感性和稳健性方面有显著提高,这说明了该框架在跨学科研究环境中的有效性。

结论

通过我们将用户体验和游戏设计与人体运动科学相结合的示例,我们表明我们的框架极大地提高了文献检索的质量,凸显了其在推进跨学科研究方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/a9e2d5aaebb3/fpubh-13-1489161-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/6c4ccbda33a0/fpubh-13-1489161-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/5df724596716/fpubh-13-1489161-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/97243619c22c/fpubh-13-1489161-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/1b1155b9d4cf/fpubh-13-1489161-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/82c140c0235c/fpubh-13-1489161-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/a9e2d5aaebb3/fpubh-13-1489161-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/6c4ccbda33a0/fpubh-13-1489161-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/5df724596716/fpubh-13-1489161-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/97243619c22c/fpubh-13-1489161-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/1b1155b9d4cf/fpubh-13-1489161-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/82c140c0235c/fpubh-13-1489161-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81fa/12202348/a9e2d5aaebb3/fpubh-13-1489161-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Introducing CRIS-A unified framework for systematic literature searches across disciplines.介绍CRIS——一个跨学科系统文献检索的统一框架。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1489161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1489161. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital interactive experience- and game-based fall interventions for community-dwelling healthy older adults: a cross-disciplinary systematic review.针对社区居住的健康老年人的基于数字互动体验和游戏的跌倒干预措施:一项跨学科系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;12:1489258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1489258. eCollection 2024.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
5
The "realist search": A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting.“现实主义搜索”:当前实践和报告的系统范围综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Jan;11(1):14-35. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1386. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
6
Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.迈向系统评价自动化:在研究综合中使用机器学习工具的实用指南。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9.
7
Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.机器学习算法在系统评价中的应用:减少动物研究临床前评价中的工作量和减少人为筛选错误。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 15;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0942-7.
8
Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.仅使用主要主题词或标题和摘要字段检索 Embase 和 MEDLINE:一项前瞻性探索性研究。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 20;7(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0864-9.
9
Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care.介绍 PALETTE 方法:一种用于进行姑息治疗综述文献检索的迭代方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 2;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0335-z.
10
Interdisciplinary collaboration in action: tracking the signal, tracing the noise.实际中的跨学科合作:追踪信号,追查噪音。
Palgrave Commun. 2015;1:15019. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2015.19. Epub 2015 Jul 21.