School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 3rd Floor, Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, 202 WVH, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9.
Technologies and methods to speed up the production of systematic reviews by reducing the manual labour involved have recently emerged. Automation has been proposed or used to expedite most steps of the systematic review process, including search, screening, and data extraction. However, how these technologies work in practice and when (and when not) to use them is often not clear to practitioners. In this practical guide, we provide an overview of current machine learning methods that have been proposed to expedite evidence synthesis. We also offer guidance on which of these are ready for use, their strengths and weaknesses, and how a systematic review team might go about using them in practice.
最近出现了一些技术和方法,可以通过减少人工劳动来加快系统评价的制作。自动化已被提议或用于加快系统评价过程的大多数步骤,包括搜索、筛选和数据提取。然而,这些技术在实践中的工作方式以及何时(以及何时不)使用它们,对于从业者来说往往并不清楚。在本实践指南中,我们概述了目前已被提议用于加快证据综合的机器学习方法。我们还就哪些方法已准备好使用、它们的优缺点以及系统评价团队如何在实践中使用它们提供了指导。