• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在卢旺达一家大型教学医院的急诊科实施安全气道检查表(SAC):一项干预前后研究。

Implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) at the emergency department of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda: A pre- and post-intervention study.

作者信息

Biramahire Joseph, Pereira Matthew, Manirafasha Appolinaire, Uwamahoro Doris Lorette, Mvukiyehe Jean Paul, Banguti Paulin, Tuyishime Eugene

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kibagabaga Hospital, Rwanda.

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Afr J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;15(3):100871. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.afjem.2025.03.002
PMID:40584898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12205540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Airway management is a critical aspect of emergency care, and adherence to standardized protocols can improve patient outcomes. However, in resource-limited settings such as Rwanda, the implementation of airway management protocols in the emergency department (ED) may face challenges. This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) on airway management practices and post-intubation complications in a major teaching hospital in Rwanda.

METHODS

A pre- and post-intervention study design was used to assess the impact of the SAC on intubation practices and post-intubation checklist in the ED at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. The study included a baseline assessment of residents' intubation practices, followed by implementation of the SAC, and post-implementation data collection to evaluate changes in adherence to airway management practices and post-intubation complications.

RESULTS

Among 77 intubation (40 pre-intervention and 37 post-intervention), the implementation of the SAC led to improvement in 4 key airway management practices (airway cart and glidescope setup, premedication use, restraining patients, and checking ABG within 10-15 min) in the ED. However, the reduction in rates of post-intubation complications was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the Safe Airway Checklist in the ED of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda significantly improved several critical aspects of airway management. While no statistically significant reduction in post-intubation complications were observed, the decreasing trend of complication rates suggests promising benefits that merit further exploration. These findings highlight the value of standardized checklists in enhancing clinical practices and underscore the need for ongoing research to fully understand their impact on patient outcomes especially in low resources settings.

摘要

背景

气道管理是急诊护理的关键环节,遵循标准化方案可改善患者预后。然而,在卢旺达等资源有限的环境中,急诊科实施气道管理方案可能面临挑战。本研究旨在评估在卢旺达一家大型教学医院实施安全气道检查表(SAC)对气道管理实践和插管后并发症的影响。

方法

采用干预前后研究设计,评估SAC对基加利大学教学医院急诊科插管实践和插管后检查表的影响。该研究包括对住院医师插管实践的基线评估,随后实施SAC,并在实施后收集数据,以评估气道管理实践依从性和插管后并发症的变化。

结果

在77例插管病例中(干预前40例,干预后37例),SAC的实施使急诊科4项关键气道管理实践(气道推车和可视喉镜设置、使用术前用药、约束患者以及在10 - 15分钟内检查动脉血气)得到改善。然而,插管后并发症发生率的降低无统计学意义。

结论

在卢旺达一家大型教学医院的急诊科实施安全气道检查表显著改善了气道管理的几个关键方面。虽然未观察到插管后并发症发生率有统计学意义的降低,但并发症发生率的下降趋势表明可能存在有益效果,值得进一步探索。这些发现凸显了标准化检查表在加强临床实践中的价值,并强调需要持续开展研究,以充分了解其对患者预后的影响,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79bf/12205540/d98ba0c08204/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79bf/12205540/d98ba0c08204/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79bf/12205540/d98ba0c08204/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) at the emergency department of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda: A pre- and post-intervention study.在卢旺达一家大型教学医院的急诊科实施安全气道检查表(SAC):一项干预前后研究。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;15(3):100871. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.针对需要气管插管的成年患者,视频喉镜检查与直接喉镜检查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于成人气管插管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
8
Pre-deployment programmes for building resilience in military and frontline emergency service personnel.军事和一线应急服务人员的韧性建设部署前方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD013242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013242.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Emergency Department Physical Restraint Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊室身体约束使用中的种族差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1;183(11):1229-1237. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4832.
2
Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Critically Ill Adult Patient.危重症成人患者快速序贯诱导插管的重症医学会临床实践指南。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 1;51(10):1411-1430. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006000. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Risk factors for peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
围插管期心搏骤停的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed J. 2024 Jun;47(3):100656. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100656. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Quality Evaluation of a Checklist for Intubation Preparation in Graduate Medical Education.研究生医学教育中插管准备检查表的质量评估
Cureus. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):e25830. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25830. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Does utilization of an intubation safety checklist reduce omissions during simulated resuscitation scenarios: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.使用插管安全检查表是否能减少模拟复苏场景中的遗漏:一项多中心随机对照试验。
CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00010-w. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
6
Implementation science: What is it and why should I care?实施科学:它是什么,为什么我应该关心?
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Emergency intubation in trauma in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省创伤患者的紧急插管
S Afr Med J. 2018 Jul 25;108(8):660-666. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i8.12670.
8
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Development of a standard operating procedure and checklist for rapid sequence induction in the critically ill.制定危重症患者快速顺序诱导的标准操作程序和检查表。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Sep 11;22:41. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0041-7.
10
Impact of checklists on peri-intubation care in ED trauma patients.检查表对急诊科创伤患者气管插管围术期护理的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):541-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 14.