Luciano Afito, Jallow Binta J J, Liu Mandie, Ma Yuting, Miambo Regina Daniel, Meng Fanming
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
SCIENCE Department, The Gambia College, Gambia.
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2025 Jun 4;30:e00437. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2025.e00437. eCollection 2025 Aug.
and are highly adaptable ectoparasites that feed on vertebrates, including people and both domestic and wild animals. This systematic review aims to identify, compile, and evaluate relevant articles published after January 1, 2000, until April 30, 2024, from several scientific databases documenting the distribution or prevalence of . and/or . , as well as tick-borne pathogens globally. We conducted a thorough search in Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to April 30, 2024. This systematic review was implemented according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of the 223 studies included in this systematic review, 83.0 % detected . , reported across 42 countries. In contrast, 17.0 % detected . , which has only been reported in eight countries. A total of 113 studies included in this systematic review reported the presence of tick-borne pathogens, with 78.8 % focused on . and 21.2 % addressing . . In this review, 94 tick-borne pathogens were reported. Of the tick-borne pathogens identified in . , bacteria were the most reported, representing 71.6 %, followed by viruses with 15.1 %. Among bacteria, the genus was the most frequent, with 26.8 %, followed by , with 17.2 %. The tick-borne pathogens identified in . , bacteria were the most frequent, with 68.1 %, followed by protozoa, with 21.3 %. Genus was the most frequent among bacteria, with 25.5 %, followed by with 19.2 %. This systematic review provided insight crucial for managing and controlling tick-borne diseases by integrating the One Health approach.
蜱虫是高度适应性强的体外寄生虫，以脊椎动物为食，包括人类以及家畜和野生动物。本系统评价旨在识别、汇编和评估2000年1月1日至2024年4月30日期间从多个科学数据库发表的相关文章，这些文章记录了蜱虫的分布或流行情况，以及全球范围内蜱传病原体。我们于2000年1月1日至2024年4月30日在Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Scopus中进行了全面搜索。本系统评价是根据PRISMA 2020指南实施的。在本系统评价纳入的223项研究中，83.0%检测到了某蜱虫，分布于42个国家。相比之下，17.0%检测到了另一种蜱虫，仅在8个国家有报告。本系统评价纳入的总共113项研究报告了蜱传病原体的存在情况，其中78.8%关注某病原体，21.2%涉及另一种病原体。在本评价中，报告了94种蜱传病原体。在某蜱虫中鉴定出的蜱传病原体中，细菌报告最多，占71.6%，其次是病毒占15.1%。在细菌中,某属最常见，占26.8%，其次是另一属，占17.2%。在另一种蜱虫中鉴定出 的蜱传病原体中，细菌最常见，占68.1%，其次是原生动物，占21.3%。在细菌中某属最常见，占25.5%，其次是另一属，占19.2%。本系统评价通过整合“同一健康”方法，为管理和控制蜱传疾病提供了至关重要的见解。
需注意，原文中部分蜱虫种类等专业名称未给出具体中文对应，以上译文以“某蜱虫”“某病原体”等暂代以便呈现整体内容结构，实际应用中应根据准确信息替换。
Zotero 插件
