Morin Titouan, Caillet Arnault H, Nordez Antoine, Doguet Valentin, Lacourpaille Lilian
Movement - Interactions - Performance, UR 4334, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Jul 1;139(1):296-307. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00237.2025. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
This study aimed to determine whether muscle activation distribution between hamstrings is modified after 9 wk of two resistance training programs that induce selective muscle hypertrophy. Using a blinded, randomized, controlled design, 36 resistance-untrained individuals were assigned to one of the three groups: control (CON), Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE), or stiff-leg deadlift (SDL). Strength gain was measured as changes in one-repetition maximum (1RM). Changes in semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST), and biceps femoris (BF) muscle volume were measured using three-dimensional (3-D) freehand ultrasound. Activation of each hamstring muscle head was assessed using surface electromyography during the trained exercise (or both for CON) performed at 80% of 1RM. We found a significant increase in 1RM after 9 wk for the NHE (37.4 ± 13.8%) and SDL (34.0 ± 21.2%) groups compared with CON. This strength gain was accompanied by selective hypertrophy of ST (24.3 ± 10.8%) and SM (11.2 ± 12.7%), for the NHE and SDL groups, respectively. However, statistical parametric mapping analyses revealed that muscle activation was not altered over time, between the groups, or by their interactions (all ≥ 0.05). Our findings demonstrate the robustness of muscle activation strategies over time despite training-induced selective hypertrophy. These results provide a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between neural drive and muscle mechanical characteristics. This provides additional impetus to study long-term effects of activation strategies (e.g., on the development of musculoskeletal disorders), as they seem to represent a trait-like characteristic rather than a transient state. We demonstrate that stiff-leg deadlift and Nordic hamstring exercises are effective in inducing selective hypertrophy of the semimembranosus (11.2%) and semitendinosus (24.4%), respectively. Hamstring muscle activation did not adapt to the change in the distribution of muscle volume. These resistance training exercises, commonly used in hamstring prevention and rehabilitation strategies, appear effective at increasing the force-generating potential of the targeted muscles in noninjured individuals, as their muscle volume increases without altering their activation strategies.
本研究旨在确定在进行9周的两种诱导选择性肌肉肥大的抗阻训练计划后,绳肌之间的肌肉激活分布是否会发生改变。采用双盲、随机、对照设计,将36名未经抗阻训练的个体分为三组之一:对照组(CON)、北欧绳肌练习组(NHE)或直腿硬拉组(SDL)。力量增长以一次重复最大值(1RM)的变化来衡量。使用三维(3-D)徒手超声测量半膜肌(SM)、半腱肌(ST)和股二头肌(BF)的肌肉体积变化。在以1RM的80%进行训练练习(CON组为两种练习)期间,使用表面肌电图评估每条绳肌头的激活情况。我们发现,与CON组相比,NHE组(37.4±13.8%)和SDL组(34.0±21.2%)在9周后1RM有显著增加。这种力量增长分别伴随着NHE组和SDL组中ST(24.3±10.8%)和SM(11.2±12.7%)的选择性肥大。然而,统计参数映射分析显示,肌肉激活在不同时间、不同组之间或它们的相互作用中均未改变(所有P≥0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,尽管训练诱导了选择性肥大,但随着时间推移,肌肉激活策略具有稳健性。这些结果为深入理解神经驱动与肌肉力学特性之间的复杂相互作用提供了依据。这为研究激活策略的长期影响(例如对肌肉骨骼疾病发展的影响)提供了额外的动力,因为它们似乎代表一种特质样特征而非短暂状态。我们证明,直腿硬拉和北欧绳肌练习分别能有效诱导半膜肌(11.2%)和半腱肌(24.4%)的选择性肥大。绳肌的肌肉激活并未适应肌肉体积分布的变化。这些常用于绳肌预防和康复策略的抗阻训练练习,在增加未受伤个体中目标肌肉的力量生成潜力方面似乎是有效的,因为它们的肌肉体积增加而不改变其激活策略。