Nagpal Devendra I, Dharampuria Samiksha Ram, Singh Prabhat, Chaudhari Purva, Rathi Pooja, Gurharikar Ayushi
Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2025 Apr 1;43(2):261-268. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_119_25. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
Effective pain management in children during local anesthetic administration would be a key to a successful and painless dental procedure. Precooling (PC) has emerged as pain control tool in dentistry.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of lidocaine Ice button and lidocaine gel as topical anesthesia during maxillary buccal infiltration in children.
Randomized crossover trial, department of pediatric and preventive dentistry.
Thirty children [60 local anesthesia (LA) injections] aged 6-10 years requiring bilateral maxillary buccal infiltration for dental procedure, divided into 2 groups with equal distribution for this split-mouth study. The study group was lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia; the control group was the lidocaine gel group. Subjective pain was evaluated using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, objective pain evaluation was done using Sound Eye and Motor (SEM) scale. Anxiety assessment using Venham picture test (VPT) and physiologic parameters such as SpO2 and Heart rate were evaluated before, during, and after administration of LA. Acceptance of lidocaine ice button was evaluated using a customized validated questionnaire.
Data recorded in Microsoft Excel 365 and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Product and service solution SPSS version 21.0 with P value considered statistically significant at < 0.05.
A significant reduction in pain on injection for both objective and subjective evaluations in the Lidocaine Ice Button group, as topical anesthesia was seen (P < 0.00011) Majority of the children preferred the use of Lidocaine ice button as a topical anesthetic. No difference in pain was observed in groups based on treatment sequence.
Less pain on injection was observed, proving the efficacy of lidocaine ice button as topical anesthesia for maxillary infiltration in the study. Lidocaine ice button was well accepted by the children as topical anesthesia.
在局部麻醉给药过程中对儿童进行有效的疼痛管理是成功开展无痛牙科手术的关键。预冷(PC)已成为牙科领域的一种疼痛控制工具。
本研究旨在评估和比较利多卡因冰棒和利多卡因凝胶在上颌颊侧浸润麻醉中作为局部麻醉药对儿童的疗效。
随机交叉试验,儿童与预防牙科科室。
30名6至10岁需要进行双侧上颌颊侧浸润麻醉以进行牙科手术的儿童[60次局部麻醉(LA)注射],分为两组,在这项口内对照研究中平均分配。研究组采用利多卡因冰棒局部麻醉;对照组为利多卡因凝胶组。使用面部表情疼痛评分量表评估主观疼痛,使用声音、眼神和动作(SEM)量表进行客观疼痛评估。在局部麻醉给药前、给药期间和给药后,使用韦纳姆图片测试(VPT)评估焦虑情况,并评估诸如血氧饱和度(SpO2)和心率等生理参数。使用定制的经过验证的问卷评估对利多卡因冰棒的接受程度。
数据记录在Microsoft Excel 365中,并使用统计产品与服务解决方案SPSS 21.0版进行统计分析,P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
利多卡因冰棒组在作为局部麻醉药时,客观和主观评估的注射疼痛均显著降低(P<0.00011)。大多数儿童更喜欢使用利多卡因冰棒作为局部麻醉药。基于治疗顺序,两组之间未观察到疼痛差异。
观察到注射时疼痛减轻,证明利多卡因冰棒作为上颌浸润局部麻醉药的疗效。利多卡因冰棒作为局部麻醉药被儿童广泛接受。