Kingma Tyler J, Albeyoumi Hossam, Kolluri Madhumita, Sapowadia Avin, Mehta Aryan, Kholoki Obada, Passey Siddhant, Wakefield Dorothy, Husain Saima
Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT, 06030-1235, USA.
Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT, USA.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02708-2.
The mainstay of therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has long been guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). This is further complicated by those who have concomitant ventricular dyssynchrony due to conduction abnormalities requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim in our study was to investigate the role of GDMT in predicting response to CRT.
We performed a retrospective chart review of 181 patients at St. Francis Hospital of Trinity Health of New England and UConn John Dempsey Hospital with HFrEF diagnosis who underwent CRT between 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2024. Specifically, individual medications were evaluated as either meeting the target dose or not of GDMT prior to CRT. Then, the effect of achieving target doses was then compared in patients deemed CRT 'responders' and 'non-responders'.
Patients receiving a higher number of optimally dosed GDMT showed a significant trend (p = 0.0277) toward responding to CRT. There was no significant difference between 1 and 0 therapies (OR 1.487; 95% CI, 0.689-3.209) and between 1 and 2-4 (OR 0.427; 95% CI, 0.123-1.487). However, patients receiving 2-4 optimally dosed GDMT were 3.48 times (95% CI, 1.050-11.529) more likely to be a responder when compared to those on 0 optimally dosed therapies.
There is a statistically significant trend toward responding to CRT when patients are on a higher number of optimally dosed GDMT, especially with > 2 therapies. Based on this data, patients should be optimized with as many optimally dosed medications as tolerated for improved outcomes.
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的主要治疗方法长期以来一直是指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)。对于那些因传导异常而伴有心室不同步,需要植入式心脏复律除颤器或心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者,情况更为复杂。我们研究的目的是调查GDMT在预测CRT反应中的作用。
我们对新英格兰三一健康圣弗朗西斯医院和康涅狄格大学约翰·邓普西医院的181例诊断为HFrEF且在2014年1月1日至2024年1月1日期间接受CRT的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。具体而言,在CRT之前,评估每种药物是否达到GDMT的目标剂量。然后,比较达到目标剂量对被视为CRT“反应者”和“无反应者”的患者的影响。
接受更多最佳剂量GDMT的患者对CRT有反应的趋势显著(p = 0.0277)。1种治疗与0种治疗之间(OR 1.487;95% CI,0.689 - 3.209)以及1种治疗与2 - 4种治疗之间(OR 0.427;95% CI,0.123 - 1.487)无显著差异。然而,与接受0种最佳剂量治疗的患者相比,接受2 - 4种最佳剂量GDMT的患者成为反应者的可能性高3.48倍(95% CI,1.050 - 11.529)。
当患者接受更多最佳剂量的GDMT时,尤其是超过2种治疗时,对CRT有反应的趋势具有统计学意义。基于这些数据,应让患者尽可能多地接受最佳剂量的药物治疗,以改善预后,只要患者能够耐受。