• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在从急诊科转至退伍军人事务医院的院际转移后,提高医院记录的电子可获取性。

Enhancing Electronic Availability of Hospital Records Following Interhospital Transfer From Emergency Departments to a Veterans Affairs Hospital.

作者信息

Jordano James O, Fausone Maureen, Cauley Michael R, Rubenstein Melissa, Swanson Terra, Sopko Kelly, Ward Michael J

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.

Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaf288.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf288
PMID:40587388
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With regionalization of specialized care and consolidation of rural hospitals, safe and efficient care transitions via interhospital transfers, particularly for patients in the emergency department (ED), are of paramount importance to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Transferred patients are at higher risk for mortality, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. Complete documentation is central to high quality care transitions yet is infrequently completed. Incomplete documentation may harm patients by fragmenting care. Since the passage of federal legislation, non-Veteran Affairs (VA) emergency care has skyrocketed. However, the lack of a standardized process for medical record sharing following non-VA ED visits and subsequent interhospital transfer risks care interruption and therefore patient safety. We sought to evaluate the existing process and how standardization may affect the timeliness and availability of Veteran hospital records from non-VA hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a quality improvement project conducted at a single, urban, community, level 1 complexity VA-the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville Campus (TVHS-Na). Before this project, paper medical records related to non-VA emergency care were given to the primary team by the transferring ambulance service. Paper records were then uploaded to the document imaging system at each team's discretion, typically after hospital discharge. To understand the problem and flow of records, we conducted a contextual inquiry. From there, we developed and implemented a standardized process to receive and upload electronic health records before the patient arrived at the hospital for all daytime weekday transfers. After-hours transfers maintained existing processes. The project had a Plan-Do-Study-Act design, informed by the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Roadmap.The project was approved as a quality improvement project by the local institutional review board. Interhospital transfers were tracked from January 2024 to September 2024. All transfers from a non-VA ED to TVHS-Na as a direct hospital floor admission were included. The primary outcomes were time until availability of scanned records and percent of transfers with uploaded records as identified in the document imaging system.

RESULTS

Through a contextual inquiry with stakeholders, we identified that intervention at the time of transfer acceptance was possible with the help of transfer coordinators. As part of the novel intervention, coordinators would ask transferring hospitals for electronic transmission of certain optional documents. This would occur before the physical transfer of the patient. Over the project's course, there were 157 interhospital transfers from non-VA EDs that met eligibility. Before implementation, the median (interquartile range, IQR) time to document availability was 33 (24, 36) days. The proportion of transfers with uploaded records at this time was 40% (13/32). Ten transfers occurred during the "washout phase" during which the intervention was implemented. After implementation, the median (IQR) time until upload improved to 0 (0, 0) days. The proportion of transfers with uploaded records also improved to 51% (59/115).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a simple, standardized process increased the number of transfers with available records and reduced the time until the electronic availability of those records. However, after-hours transfers remain a target for future intervention.

摘要

引言

随着专科护理区域化和农村医院的整合,通过医院间转诊实现安全高效的护理过渡,尤其是对于急诊科(ED)的患者而言,对于确保患者获得最佳治疗效果至关重要。转诊患者面临更高的死亡风险、更长的住院时间和更高的费用。完整的文件记录是高质量护理过渡的核心,但却很少能完成。不完整的文件记录可能会因护理碎片化而伤害患者。自联邦立法通过以来,非退伍军人事务部(VA)的急诊护理量激增。然而,非VA急诊就诊及随后的医院间转诊后缺乏标准化的病历共享流程,存在护理中断风险,进而影响患者安全。我们试图评估现有流程以及标准化可能如何影响退伍军人医院从非VA医院获取记录的及时性和可用性。

材料与方法

这是一项在田纳西州纳什维尔市退伍军人事务部田纳西河谷医疗系统纳什维尔校区(TVHS-Na)开展的单中心、城市、社区、一级复杂性的质量改进项目。在本项目开展之前,与非VA急诊护理相关的纸质病历由转运救护车服务提供给主要团队。纸质病历随后由各团队自行决定上传至文档成像系统,通常是在患者出院后。为了解病历问题和流程,我们进行了情境调查。在此基础上,我们制定并实施了标准化流程,以便在工作日白天患者入院前接收并上传电子健康记录。非工作时间的转诊维持现有流程。该项目采用计划-执行-研究-行动设计,参考了VA质量提升研究倡议路线图。该项目被当地机构审查委员会批准为质量改进项目。对2024年1月至2024年9月期间的医院间转诊进行跟踪。纳入所有从非VA急诊科直接转入TVHS-Na医院病房的转诊病例。主要结局指标为扫描记录可获取的时间以及文档成像系统中记录上传的转诊病例百分比。

结果

通过与利益相关者进行情境调查,我们发现转运协调员能够在接收转诊时进行干预。作为新干预措施的一部分,协调员会要求转诊医院以电子方式传输某些可选文件。这将在患者实际转诊之前进行。在项目实施过程中,有157例来自非VA急诊科的医院间转诊符合条件。实施前,记录可获取的中位时间(四分位间距,IQR)为33(24,36)天。此时记录上传的转诊病例比例为40%(13/32)。在实施干预的“洗脱期”发生了10例转诊。实施后,上传的中位时间(IQR)缩短至0(0,0)天。记录上传的转诊病例比例也提高到了51%(59/115)。

结论

实施简单的标准化流程增加了有可用记录的转诊数量,并缩短了这些记录电子可获取的时间。然而,非工作时间的转诊仍是未来干预的目标。

相似文献

1
Enhancing Electronic Availability of Hospital Records Following Interhospital Transfer From Emergency Departments to a Veterans Affairs Hospital.在从急诊科转至退伍军人事务医院的院际转移后,提高医院记录的电子可获取性。
Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaf288.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients.外科患者的麻醉:医师麻醉师与非医师麻醉提供者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 11;2014(7):CD010357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010357.pub2.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.