Imaizumi Ken, Kasajima Hiroyuki, Terashima Kazutoshi, Furukawa Naoe, Ito Keiichiro, Fukasawa Takumu, Odagiri Tadashi, Yamana Daisuke, Tsuruga Yosuke, Umehara Minoru, Kurushima Michihiro, Nakanishi Kazuaki
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurse, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e43099. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043099.
This study investigates the association between prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) using the open method and incisional surgical site infection (SSI) following emergency lower gastrointestinal surgery. We retrospectively examined 210 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for lower gastrointestinal tract perforation or necrosis at a single center between January 2018 and March 2023. Outcomes were compared between patients who received pNPWT and those who received conventional wound management. Propensity score analyses included multivariate analysis using the propensity score in the crude cohort, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching. The primary endpoint was the incidence of incisional SSI and the secondary endpoints were wound healing time, postoperative hospital stay, identification of incisional SSI risk factors, and determination of optimal pNPWT management. In the crude cohort (pNPWT = 41, conventional = 169), incisional SSI occurred in 11 (26.8%) and 65 (38.5%) patients, respectively (P = .227). After propensity score analyses, pNPWT was significantly associated with a reduction in incisional SSI, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 0.344 (0.147-0.804; P = .002), 0.260 (0.103-0.794; P = .002), and 0.285 (0.106-0.763; P = .012) in the multivariate analysis, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and propensity score-matched cohort (pNPWT = 30, conventional = 60), respectively. Wound healing time and postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between the groups. Risk factors for incisional SSI were poor American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status and perforation, with the addition of conventional wound management. Early application of pNPWT (≤2 days postoperatively) further reduced the incidence of SSI (17.6% vs 71.4%; P = .010). In propensity score analyses, pNPWT was associated with a significant reduction in incisional SSI in contaminated abdominal wounds after lower gastrointestinal surgery. Early application may enhance its effectiveness. pNPWT should be considered for high-risk patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.
本研究调查了开放法预防性负压伤口治疗(pNPWT)与急诊下消化道手术后手术切口部位感染(SSI)之间的关联。我们回顾性分析了2018年1月至2023年3月期间在单一中心接受急诊手术治疗下消化道穿孔或坏死的210例连续患者。比较了接受pNPWT的患者和接受传统伤口处理的患者的结局。倾向评分分析包括在原始队列中使用倾向评分的多变量分析、治疗权重的逆概率分析以及1:2最近邻匹配。主要终点是手术切口SSI的发生率,次要终点是伤口愈合时间、术后住院时间、确定手术切口SSI的危险因素以及确定最佳pNPWT管理方案。在原始队列中(pNPWT组=41例,传统组=169例),手术切口SSI分别发生在11例(26.8%)和65例(38.5%)患者中(P = 0.227)。经过倾向评分分析后,在多变量分析、治疗权重的逆概率分析以及倾向评分匹配队列(pNPWT组=30例,传统组=60例)中,pNPWT与手术切口SSI的减少显著相关,比值比(95%置信区间)分别为0.344(0.147 - 0.804;P = 0.002)、0.260(0.103 - 0.794;P = 0.002)和0.285(0.106 - 0.763;P = 0.012)。两组之间的伤口愈合时间和术后住院时间无显著差异。手术切口SSI的危险因素是美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分差和穿孔,以及采用传统伤口处理。早期应用pNPWT(术后≤2天)进一步降低了SSI的发生率(17.6%对71.4%;P = 0.010)。在倾向评分分析中,pNPWT与下消化道手术后污染腹部伤口的手术切口SSI显著减少相关。早期应用可能会提高其有效性。对于接受急诊腹部手术的高危患者,应考虑使用pNPWT。