Suppr超能文献

采用封闭式腹部切口局部负压治疗预防外科伤口感染 - “SWIPE IT”随机临床试验。

Surgical wound infection prevention using topical negative pressure therapy on closed abdominal incisions - the 'SWIPE IT' randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia; School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Department of Surgery, Blacktown-Mount Druitt Hospital, Mount Druitt, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr;110:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in surgical patients. It is unclear whether incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can reduce the risk of SSIs in patients after open abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, non-blinded multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed to evaluate the incidence of SSI post-laparotomy using incisional NPWT compared with a standard dressing. The primary outcome was the rate of superficial SSI.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients (61 patients in the NPWT arm and 63 patients in the control arm) were included. One hundred and nine (87.9%) patients underwent colorectal surgery; 61 patients (49.2%) had emergency surgery. There were more superficial SSIs in the control group than in the NPWT group, although not statistically significant (20.6% vs 9.8%, P=0.1). Upon multiple logistic regression analysis, control dressings were associated with increased risk of superficial SSI although again, not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-7.17, P=0.11). There was no superficial non-SSI related wound dehiscence in the NPWT group compared with 9.5% in the control group (P=0.03). There was no difference in postoperative complications (P=0.15), nor in other wound complications (P=0.79).

CONCLUSION

NPWT was not associated with decreased superficial SSI in this RCT. However, there was a statistically significant reduction in superficial wound dehiscence with NWPT dressings. The results of this study should be included in meta-analyses for better evaluation of NPWT on closed abdominal incisions.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)是外科患者中最常见的医院获得性感染原因。目前尚不清楚开放式腹部手术后,切口负压伤口治疗(NPWT)是否可以降低 SSI 的风险。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性、非盲多中心随机对照试验(RCT),以评估与标准敷料相比,切口 NPWT 用于剖腹手术后 SSI 的发生率。主要结局是浅表性 SSI 的发生率。

结果

共纳入 124 例患者(NPWT 组 61 例,对照组 63 例)。109 例(87.9%)患者接受结直肠手术;61 例(49.2%)为急诊手术。对照组的浅表性 SSI 发生率高于 NPWT 组,但差异无统计学意义(20.6%比 9.8%,P=0.1)。经多因素逻辑回归分析,尽管差异无统计学意义(比值比(OR)2.41,95%置信区间(CI)0.81-7.17,P=0.11),但对照组的切口敷料与浅表性 SSI 的风险增加相关。NPWT 组无浅表性非 SSI 相关切口裂开,而对照组为 9.5%(P=0.03)。NPWT 组术后并发症(P=0.15)和其他伤口并发症(P=0.79)无差异。

结论

在这项 RCT 中,NPWT 与减少浅表性 SSI 无关。然而,NPWT 敷料可显著降低浅表性切口裂开的发生率。该研究结果应纳入荟萃分析,以更好地评估 NPWT 对闭合性腹部切口的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验