• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于传统指标构建ICU脓毒症患者短期死亡率风险模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Construction of a risk model for short-term mortality in ICU sepsis patients based on conventional indicators: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Qin Hongmei, Liu Ke, Fu Yaoqing, Wu Xin

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e42950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042950.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000042950
PMID:40587699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12212757/
Abstract

Sepsis, a life-threatening systemic inflammatory response syndrome triggered by infection, is associated with high morbidity and substantial short-term mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting 28-day mortality risk in sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The study included 338 sepsis patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 229 patients from the ICU with sepsis from January 2018 to December 2021 were assigned to the training set, and 109 ICU sepsis patients from January 2022 to December 2023 made up the validation set. Following a 28-day ICU stay, the training set was categorized into survivors (169 patients) and non-survivors (60 patients) based on their outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for mortality in sepsis patients. A nomogram was then constructed using these risk factors to estimate the 28-day mortality risk for ICU patients diagnosed with sepsis. The nomogram's predictive accuracy was assessed using the area under the curve from the receiver operating characteristic curve, along with calibration and decision curve analysis. Logistic regression analysis indicated that sequential organ failure assessment (OR = 1.368, 95% CI = 1.175-1.773), disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR = 1.225, 95% CI = 1.195-1.924), white blood cell (OR = 1.181, 95% CI = 1.012-1.378), and interleukin-6 (OR = 1.063, 95% CI = 0.920-1.208) are independent factors influencing mortality in ICU patients with sepsis within a 28-day period. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under the curves of 0.913 (95% CI = 0.863-0.963) for the training set and 0.799 (95% CI = 0.669-0.929) for the validation set. Additionally, the calibration curves for both datasets closely correspond with the diagonal line, suggesting a strong fit. The decision curve analysis curve illustrates that the nomogram's training set along with the validation set offer an improved clinical net benefit. This research identified sequential organ failure assessment, disseminated intravascular coagulation, white blood cell, and interleukin-6 as independent factors affecting 28-day mortality in ICU sepsis patients and developed a predictive nomogram. This nomogram facilitates individualized prognostic assessment and offers a scientific basis for the widespread application of this risk-stratification tool in ICUs.

摘要

脓毒症是一种由感染引发的危及生命的全身炎症反应综合征,具有高发病率和较高的短期死亡率。本研究旨在开发并验证一种用于预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者28天死亡风险的列线图。该研究纳入了338例符合纳入标准的脓毒症患者。其中,2018年1月至2021年12月来自ICU的229例脓毒症患者被分配到训练集,2022年1月至2023年12月的109例ICU脓毒症患者组成验证集。在ICU住院28天后,根据训练集患者的结局将其分为幸存者(169例)和非幸存者(60例)。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定脓毒症患者死亡的独立危险因素。然后使用这些危险因素构建列线图,以估计诊断为脓毒症的ICU患者的28天死亡风险。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积、校准和决策曲线分析评估列线图的预测准确性。逻辑回归分析表明,序贯器官衰竭评估(OR = 1.368,95%CI = 1.175 - 1.773)、弥散性血管内凝血(OR = 1.225,95%CI = 1.195 - 1.924)、白细胞(OR = 1.181,95%CI = 1.012 - 1.378)和白细胞介素-6(OR = 1.06⒊95%CI = 0.920 - 1.208)是影响ICU脓毒症患者28天内死亡的独立因素。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,训练集曲线下面积为0.913(95%CI = 0.863 - 0.963),验证集为0.799(95%CI = 0.669 - 0.929)。此外,两个数据集的校准曲线与对角线密切对应,表明拟合良好。决策曲线分析曲线表明,列线图的训练集和验证集提供了更好的临床净效益。本研究确定序贯器官衰竭评估、弥散性血管内凝血、白细胞和白细胞介素-6为影响ICU脓毒症患者28天死亡的独立因素,并开发了一种预测列线图。该列线图有助于进行个体化预后评估,并为这种风险分层工具在ICU中的广泛应用提供了科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/acf0a93ccae9/medi-104-e42950-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/7ed8a3ff87cb/medi-104-e42950-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/6293890ba875/medi-104-e42950-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/b52cf70ba631/medi-104-e42950-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/a922dd28bd5d/medi-104-e42950-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/acf0a93ccae9/medi-104-e42950-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/7ed8a3ff87cb/medi-104-e42950-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/6293890ba875/medi-104-e42950-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/b52cf70ba631/medi-104-e42950-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/a922dd28bd5d/medi-104-e42950-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd4/12212757/acf0a93ccae9/medi-104-e42950-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction of a risk model for short-term mortality in ICU sepsis patients based on conventional indicators: A prospective cohort study.基于传统指标构建ICU脓毒症患者短期死亡率风险模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e42950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042950.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting of patients with acute sedative-hypnotic overdose admitted to the intensive care unit.用于预测入住重症监护病房的急性镇静催眠药过量患者的预后列线图的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85559-1.
3
The Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Sepsis Risk in Diabetic Patients with Urinary Tract Infection.预测糖尿病合并尿路感染患者脓毒症风险的列线图的开发与验证
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 27;61(2):225. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020225.
4
Assessment of S100A8/A9 and resistin as predictive biomarkers for mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.评估S100A8/A9和抵抗素作为脓毒症重症患者死亡率的预测生物标志物。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 3;15:1555307. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1555307. eCollection 2025.
5
Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.mNUTRIC评分对脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者慢性危重病的预测价值
Technol Health Care. 2025 Mar;33(2):831-837. doi: 10.1177/09287329241296430. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
A novel nomogram for predicting osteoporosis with low back pain among the patients in Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture of China.中国文山壮族苗族自治州患者中用于预测伴有腰痛的骨质疏松症的新型列线图。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 5;16:1535163. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1535163. eCollection 2025.
8
Establishment and validation of a dynamic nomogram to predict short-term prognosis and benefit of human immunoglobulin therapy in patients with novel bunyavirus sepsis in a population analysis study: a multicenter retrospective study.一项多中心回顾性研究:在人群分析研究中建立并验证动态列线图以预测新型布尼亚病毒败血症患者的短期预后及人免疫球蛋白治疗的获益情况
Virol J. 2025 Feb 28;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02651-8.
9
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting sepsis mortality into an era of pandrug-resistant E. coli through modeling.通过建模预测耐全药大肠杆菌时代的败血症死亡率。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Dec 26;4(1):278. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00693-7.
2
Comparison of five different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis.比较五种不同弥散性血管内凝血标准对预测脓毒症患者死亡率的价值。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0295050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295050. eCollection 2024.
3
Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy: The Different Prognosis in Severe Pneumonia and Bacteremia Infection Patients.
脓毒症相关性凝血病:严重肺炎和菌血症感染患者的不同预后。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231219249. doi: 10.1177/10760296231219249.
4
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis-related death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在脓毒症相关死亡预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02383-1.
5
Prognostic differences in sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌引起的脓毒症的预后差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 30;27(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04750-w.
6
2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department.2023年成人脓毒症和感染性休克最新进展:急诊科管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3188. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093188.
7
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分预测越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e064870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.
8
Mortality and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Patients With Suspected Sepsis: The Impact of Acute and Preexisting Organ Failures and Infection Likelihood.疑似脓毒症患者的死亡率及序贯器官衰竭评估评分:急性和既往存在的器官衰竭及感染可能性的影响
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Feb 21;5(2):e0865. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000865. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Risk factors and a prediction model for sepsis: A multicenter retrospective study in China.脓毒症的危险因素及预测模型:一项中国多中心回顾性研究
J Intensive Med. 2022 Apr 19;2(3):183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.02.004. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Developing an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Temporal Validation Study.开发一种可解释的机器学习模型以预测脓毒症患者的院内死亡率:一项回顾性时间验证研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):915. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030915.